[AktiviX-discuss] Why is the security certificate bad?

[andy baxter]

andy baxter wrote:
> mp wrote:
>   
>> andy baxter wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> mp wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> very interesting discussion - i wonder if anyone who understands all
>>>> this will have the inclination to collect it on the wiki for future
>>>> reference?
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> I was thinking, as I said before, it would be more useful if there was a 
>>> link to an *uncertified* page from the front page at www.aktivix.org, 
>>> explaining it all. That way listmasters who get queries could direct 
>>> people to that page as a way of answering the query.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Or they could just paste info from relevant wiki page..
>>   
>>     
> Ok - that would be fine too.
>
>   
I've put up a page at:

https://en.wiki.aktivix.org/Aktivix:Certification

which is meant to serve this purpose. I've written what I can, but it 
could do with someone who is more involved in aktivix.org than I am to 
check it over and add some more information about why aktivix decided to 
use cacert as their CA.

andy.