[AktiviX-discuss] for reflection

mark mark at aktivix.org
Fri Dec 26 12:07:58 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

bou:
> Some anarchists have been arrested in Spain.
> 
> "Using the server Riseup.net or reading the book “Contra la
> democràcia” (“Against democracy”) are evidence used in order to
> justify their detention."
> 

I don't know the legal system works in Spain, but if it's anything
like what it is in the UK, these justifications will have been written
by the police in order to frighten a judge (socially conservative
person who doesn't know much about praxis) into authorising an
eviction or denying someone bail ("preventative detention").

Once the defendant has the benefit of a decent lawyer, whose job it is
to remind the judge about human rights or to tell the judge about the
social value of their activism in civic terms that he (usually male,
yes) can understand, then bail is granted, as long as the cops didn't
find anything more incriminating when they did the raid or whatever;
like if the squat couldn't afford the correct EN 14470-1 storage
cabinets for their flammable materials, or whatever.

But of course, the important thing is that the people effected had
their freedom taken away when they needed it most, even if it will be
restored later. And in this case, it seems the defendants' lawyers
didn't get to see the reason for keeping them detained, i.e. the
prosecutor could be talking complete shite as there's no opportunity
to refute (yet). Presumably there's some time limit to this?

I would be interested to hear the full reasons given for any on-going
detention, rather than the spurious reasons the cops offered
initially. I think it is important to differentiate between reasons
cops use to scare a judge, justifications that could withstand trial,
and suspension of the right to a fair trial, if that is what's happening.

IANAL obvs.
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8MLj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the AktiviX-discuss mailing list