[alt-media-res] [ALT-MEDIA-RES] Fw: Mail delivery failed:returning message to sender

[zoe]

ah... I was missing the 'lists' bit.
was hitting reply to a mail that for some reason lacked that portion of the
address
any ideas on the wiki issue anyone?
cheers..
xx
z


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "steffen boehm" <steffen at essex.ac.uk>
To: <alt-media-res at lists.aktivix.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [alt-media-res] [ALT-MEDIA-RES] Fw: Mail delivery
failed:returning message to sender


> Test email to aktivix...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-media-res [mailto:ALT-MEDIA-RES at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of zoe
> Sent: 21 June 2006 09:36
> To: ALT-MEDIA-RES at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ALT-MEDIA-RES] Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to
> sender
>
>
> fyi....
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mail Delivery System" <Mailer-Daemon at phonecoop.coop>
> To: <zoe at esemplastic.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:27 AM
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
>
>
> > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> >
> > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> >
> >   alt-MEDIA-Res at activix.org
> >     SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO:<alt-MEDIA-Res at activix.org>:
> >     host somme.tachanka.org [209.51.172.13]: 550 relay not permitted
> >
> > ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
> >
> > Return-path: <zoe at esemplastic.net>
> > Received: from [82.138.218.23] (port=4971 helo=avid)
> > by mailin.phonecoop.coop with smtp (Exim 4.60)
> > (envelope-from <zoe at esemplastic.net>)
> > id 1Fsy3s-0007Ur-BD
> > for alt-MEDIA-Res at activix.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:27:44 +0100
> > Message-ID: <01c801c6950c$d610a8c0$0600000a at avid>
> > Reply-To: "zoe" <zoe at esemplastic.net>
> > From: "zoe" <zoe at esemplastic.net>
> > To: <alt-MEDIA-Res at activix.org>
> > Subject: Fw: [transmission-discuss] several pieces on the internet
> legislation
> > Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:29:38 +0100
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > X-Priority: 3
> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
> > X-Antivirus-Scanned: Clean
> > X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "zoe" <zoe at esemplastic.net>
> > To: <ALT-MEDIA-RES at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:27 AM
> > Subject: Fw: [transmission-discuss] several pieces on the internet
> > legislation
> >
> >
> > > this 'net neutrality' issue is important background info for the study
i
> > > think
> >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "DeeDee Halleck" <dhalleck at ucsd.edu>
> > > To: <discuss at transmission.cc>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:18 PM
> > > Subject: [transmission-discuss] several pieces on the internet
> legislation
> > >
> > >
> > > > http://www.freepress.net/news/15899  article by Lessig and McChesney
> > > > http://www.freepress.net/news/15726  NY Times article
> > > > http://www.democraticmedia.org/issues/netneutrality.html  for
> > > > industry statements on broadband
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Discuss mailing list
> > > > Discuss at transmission.cc
> > > > http://lists.transmission.cc/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> >
>
>