[blag-whereto] next meeting

[john maclean]

2009/4/27 john maclean <jayeola at gmail.com>:
> 2009/4/27 r7 <r7 at aktivix.org>:
>> weyasey wrote:
>>
>>> If everyone is ok with Wednesday then it's ok with me, but the reason
>>> Thursdays a better is because that's when we have Blag meetings in
>>> Brixton.
>>>
>>> There are usually lots of original blaggers there so we discuss loads of
>>> the issues that you submit on irc but eyeball to eyeball so to speak.
>>> However as I said before Wednesdays will be acceptable to me if that is
>>> more convenient for you guys on IRC.
>>
>> i am easy with either. for those keeping score:
>>
>> wed: junichiro, renilgh
>> thu: weyasey & the brixton blaggers
>>
>> any other opinions? we are struggling for active bodies at the moment,
>> so a statement of intention from anyone would be *really* useful.
>>
>> jisis? esb [we miss you man]? noldrin? jayeola? jason? those folks in
>> #blag who don't say much ;-)?
>>
>> r7
>> --
>> r7 [at] aktivix [dot] org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blag-whereto mailing list
>> blag-whereto at lists.aktivix.org
>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/blag-whereto
>>
>>
>
> Homer and Noldrin are afk for some time. What priorities on  :NEXT
> __must__ be covered?
>
> agenda: git
>  we all get up to speed and use it. A couple of sessions should get us
> all to a decent level
>
> spec for fsf box
> we give them a spec. I think that Homer proposed something in an irc
> convo or an email.
>
> agenda: updating noldrin'box
>  good to have the activity outlined on #3. who has access to this
> server? who wants to do it?
>
> also good to see stuff outlined in #14. i think that this is "owned"
> by homer and/or noldrin
>
> agenda: audit jebba-code dir on kimsufi [0]
>  from memory i think that we can loose most of it as it seem sas if
> the process is outlined in #3 and #14. most of that stuff is old
> anyway (pungi, mock etc).
>
> agenda: tagging sheme for rpms
> if i made a spin of BLAG and used my own naming style others could run
> with it or correct it. I think that this'll happen __after__ a flurry
> of packages have been created.
>
>
> __also__
> i have listed some defined roles and tasks on #33. please comment on
> that so that we can confirm roles and put names to them.
>
>
> [0] hats off to Jebba for maintaining this project for so long
> --
> John Maclean
> 07739 171 531
> MSc (DIC)
>
> Timezone: GMT
>



oh yeah. forgot to add that you can email me at anytime for any
reason. also you'll probably notice that i tend to be very verbose in
my emails. shoot me as required.

-- 
John Maclean
07739 171 531
MSc (DIC)

Timezone: GMT