[Cc-webedit] questionnaire
Jonathan Leighton
j at jonathanleighton.com
Thu Jul 16 20:02:19 BST 2009
On more thing: Can I suggest we set the deadline as Sunday 26th July? I
reckon if WGs are on it enough to respond, they will do so by then,
otherwise we can chase them until 2nd August.
I am about to put the development site up online. Initially we'll have
to take a lead on filling it with content, but from the start of August
it would be really great to start actively encouraging WGs to take on
management of their own areas, so that they are already familiar with
the site when it goes live.
Cheers,
Jon
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:59 +0100, Jonathan Leighton wrote:
> Hey Alistair,
>
> I think the intro text is fantastic!
>
> However, I would change the actual questions a bit. I am concerned about
> encouraging lots of people to voice their personal opinions about how
> the website should be set out. I think that's our job, what I think we
> want from them is more of an indication of what they would ideally like
> the website to do for their working group - what different types of
> content they would like to be able to have on it. I'd propose the
> following changes:
>
> 1) What do you think of your working group/neighbourhood’s section of
> the current website?
> 2) How do you think your working group/neighbourhood’s section of the
> site could be improved? What content would you ideally like to have on
> there?
> 3) Any other comments?
>
> BTW, I would suggest we use http://wufoo.com/ for collecting the data -
> we can use it for free as there won't be more than 100 responses, and it
> creates nice looking forms and reports.
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 17:48 +0100, alistair alexander wrote:
> > Interim structure looks fine - but we also discussed reverting back to
> > the old banner. I'm wondering if we should do both as a package.
> >
> > I would suggest the old banner as was (and not reworded with Camp for
> > Climate Action) for the time being. Think it will be easier to manage.
> >
> > Questionnaire...
> >
> > I think we should send email to roughly this effect (below) to Process
> > to circulate. i think there shouldn't be too many questions, and they
> > should be quite general....
> >
> >
> > The Climate Camp website is being re-developed this summer. But that’s
> > only the beginning; over the next few months – and years - we want our
> > website to become an absolutely core part of how we communicate with
> > the wider public, and with each other.
> >
> > But that will only happen if everyone involved with the camp helps us
> > to develop our website.
> >
> > So we want every working group and neighbourhood to nominate a “web
> > spoke” – someone who’ll be able to feed in to the website group their
> > working group/neighbourhood’s views, but also – and crucially –
> > someone who’ll be able to go back to their groups and really encourage
> > them to grow and tend to their areas of the new website.
> >
> > To start this process we’re sending out a few questions to every
> > working group and neighbourhood to find out what people really want
> > from the website. If each working group could get back to us with a
> > response to our questions (just one from each group/neighbourhood
> > please) , we’ll look at those and use them to develop our plans.
> >
> > We can’t guarantee that everything you suggest will be included in the
> > site, and certainly not for the launch, but we will do our best to use
> > your answers to start the process of developing a website that
> > reflects the wishes of everyone in the movement.
> >
> > If you could get your responses (a few sentences max on each question)
> > to us by 2 August as well as contact details for your spoke – that’d
> > be mighty grand.
> >
> > 1) What do you think of the current website
> > a. What do you like about it?
> > b. What don’t you like about it?
> > 2) What do you think of your working group/neighbourhood’s section of
> > the website?
> > 3) How do you think your working group/neighbourhood’s section of the
> > site could be improved
> > 4) What do you think we should have on the homepage i.e news, next
> > event, big pictures?
> > 5) How do you think the Climate Camp website could be improved in the future?
> >
> >
> > Right then - gottogo to the grand workshops workshop.
> >
> > But back on this this evening,
> >
> >
> > ali
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/7/15 Jonathan Leighton <j at jonathanleighton.com>:
> > > An update on the new site:
> > >
> > > * See my message from last week on Crabgrass about feedback from
> > > designers. We still need to create a list of reference sites. I can do
> > > this but if anyone wants to input they need to do so!
> > > * It looks like we can get hosted on a VPS from Tachanka
> > > (https://aerosan.tachanka.org/). I am just working out the details with
> > > them at the moment.
> > > * I will shortly (probably today) set up a development install of
> > > BrowserCMS with a very basic "wireframe" template. We can then start to
> > > populate it with content.
> > > * We really ought to get this questionnaire around to working groups
> > > soon. Alistair - do you know when you'll be able to do it? If you don't
> > > have time would you like me to take a stab?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 11:36 +0100, tim wrote:
> > >> Looks good to me Jonathan, although I'd add that we also need a mass
> > >> action page too which will help give the camp context this year.
> > >>
> > >> PM should have some copy for us today, so this could be used for
> > >> that.
> > >>
> > >> How's the new site development looking Jon? sorry for lack of input
> > >> since the meeting... Capacity issues!
> > >>
> > >> T
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Jonathan Stevenson
> > >> <jjjstevenson at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> With 6 weeks to go we urgently need a 'Climate Camp 2009'
> > >> section on the website. Initially I'd suggest it just has the
> > >> contents of the current front page on it but we will then want
> > >> to add further sections to it fairly rapidly, eg. the SMS
> > >> sign-ups, a more detailed what-to-bring list, perhaps a page
> > >> that takes the best of the Spread the Word section but
> > >> includes Facebook and Twitter. We could also do with an
> > >> interim restructure of the site structure while the redesign
> > >> is in progress.
> > >>
> > >> So I propose the following reorganisation of the left hand
> > >> menu:
> > >> * Home
> > >> * About Us
> > >> * Climate Camp 2009
> > >> * Carbon Trading
> > >> * Copenhagen
> > >> * National Gatherings
> > >> * Working Groups
> > >> * Local Groups
> > >> * Spread The Word
> > >> * Climate Camp G20
> > >> * Climate Camp 2008
> > >> * Camp Legal Team
> > >> * Photography
> > >> * Press
> > >> * Contact us
> > >> This basically involves inserting a section on the 2009 Camp,
> > >> putting Spread the Word higher up (although ideally it could
> > >> probably be merged into Climate Camp 2009), moving the G20
> > >> down to below the more current and putting the Legal section
> > >> lower down as it's not the main thing any more.
> > >>
> > >> Could people maybe propose any modifications in the next 24
> > >> hours or so?
> > >>
> > >> cheers,
> > >> J
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Cc-webedit mailing list
> > >> Cc-webedit at lists.aktivix.org
> > >> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-webedit
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Cc-webedit mailing list
> > >> Cc-webedit at lists.aktivix.org
> > >> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-webedit
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cc-webedit mailing list
> > > Cc-webedit at lists.aktivix.org
> > > https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-webedit
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cc-webedit mailing list
> > Cc-webedit at lists.aktivix.org
> > https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-webedit
>
More information about the Cc-webedit
mailing list