[Educationforall] spam con huevos labor news, views and concerns, 1.25.12-I

[Carlos Pelayo]

Labor Takes Early Shots At Romney, Republicans--On and Off Air Is the era of the 1% over?‏Stop Verizon Tax-Dodging and Union-Busting‏ (CWA)News From Your Union‏ (AFSCME) GOP State of the Union Response Shows Party's Priority: Beating Up on WorkersTrumka: Obama Hears Those Not Heard by the 1%‏The most toxic chemical on the planet.‏ u.s.-International Sugar Consumption: Sugar's Global History, Sources, Labor Exploitation & Environmental Degradation‏Will the Young Rise Up and Fight Their Indentured Servitude to the Student Loan Industry?  Not all jobs are equal A lower unemployment rate isn't enough.‏  @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Labor Takes Early Shots At Romney, Republicans--On and
Off Air
WEDNESDAY JAN 25, 2012 6:27 PM
DAVID MOBERG
http://www.inthesetimes.com/working/entry/12621/labor_takes_early_shots_at_romney_republicans--on_and_off_air/

Without a Democratic presidential primary contest,
unions this year are taking early potshots at Republican
primary candidates--especially Mitt Romney--and other GOP
leaders through radio and TV ads, as well as other
means.

The aim seems less to influence Republican primary
voters than to define Romney, who until this week
following Newt Gingrich's South Carolina primary victory
was the front-runner in the race, and to gain leverage
on other labor issues by tying them to high-profile
Republicans vulnerable to bad publicity.

AFSCME, the American Federation of State, County and
Municipal Employees, led the way with $800,000 worth of
ads during the current Florida contest. The spot asks,
"What kind of businessman is Mitt Romney," then tells
how Romney made huge profits from the sale of Damon
Corporation during his tenure at Bain, his private
equity company. Romney served as director of the medical
testing firm, which was heavily fined for defrauding
Medicare, described by the federal prosecutor as an
instance of "corporate greed run amok."

The ad ends by morphing Romney into Republican Gov. Rick
Scott, who ran a hospital chain, Columbia HCA, convicted
of massive Medicare fraud, and is now quite unpopular
(even though he won his office despite his defrauding a
popular government program).



SEIU (Service Employees) also is running
Spanish-language radio ads aimed at Romney in Tampa and
Orlando, Florida (jointly financed with a pro-Obama
Super-PAC, Priorities USA Action). "The two faces of
Mitt" ad portrays Romney as appealing to Latinos for
support in Spanish ads but in speeches and ads in
English, Romney opposes the Dream Act, which would allow
undocumented immigrant children who finish college or
serve in the military to become citizens, and supports
the anti-immigrant legislation passed in Alabama and
Arizona. 

While Cubans, who can become citizens simply by landing
on U.S. soil, are not greatly moved by immigration
issues, a growing fraction of Latinos in Florida are
from Mexico and other Latin American countries and are
very concerned about immigration reform. And their votes
could help swing a state like Florida in the fall.

Today and before Thursday's debate, protesters from the
Transport Workers Union will greet Mitt Romney and
object to the hiring of Bain & Company--from which Romney
still draws much of his $20 million a year income--for
the sole purpose of eliminating workers' jobs at
American Eagle, a subsidiary of American Airlines'
holding company. American declared bankruptcy last Nov.
29, and Bain is one of many advisors the company wants
to use. 

TWU filed objections in court last week to retention of
Bain as a waste of huge amounts of money in pursuit of a
questionable strategy. Calling Romney a "job cremator"
rather than a job creator, TWU president Jim Little
said, "It's outrageous that someone running for
president as a 'job creator' is going to enrich himself
by cutting pensions, cutting wages and destroying
American jobs. Like so many on Wall Street, Mitt Romney
earns his money by destroying the jobs of airline
employees. We're going to do our best to make sure
voters in Florida and elsewhere know exactly where Mitt
gets his money." So far the union has no plans to run
ads, however.

The Indiana AFL-CIO, far from the early Republican
primaries but in the thick of a fight with Gov. Mitch
Daniels and Republican legislators over a
"right-to-work" law that reflects the party's anti-labor
politics for 2012, took advantage of Daniels' role as
the Republican respondent to Obama's state of the union
speech last night. It ran ads on cable news and
throughout the state showing Daniels promising just a
few years ago that he opposed a right-to-work law for
Indiana. Today (Wednesday) the Indiana House passed the
right-to-work legislation; Gov. Daniels will soon sign
it, making Indiana the first state in 10 years to become
a right-to-work state.

TV ad campaigns are costly, and unions can hardly hope
to spend a tiny fraction of what antagonistic, primarily
Republican, candidates will devote to TV, let alone what
the right-wing Super-PACS can spend.

But strategically placed, well-done, and politically
incisive ads can make a big difference, even with a
relatively small buy. And early efforts to define
opponents can stick. (By contrast, it's hard to see that
the fuzzy, if important, message in a trial run of
national AFL-CIO ads stating that work brings people
together will help labor unions much.) But as always,
the real power of labor politically comes from
mobilizing members and allies to educate and organize
workers face-to-face. 

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 
Tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis.This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans. 
—President Obama
 Leaders are judged not only by what they say, but to whom they listen. President Obama showed last night that when working families speak out, he listens. And for that, he deserves our gratitude. 

Thank President Obama for listening—and urge him to keep it up.  

Did you see last night’s State of the Union? It was clear throughout the President’s speech that the era of the 1% is over.

One big victory—among many—in last night’s speech was President Obama’s announcement of a thorough investigation into the misconduct in the mortgage market that wrecked our economy. The president also announced the creation of a new mortgage crisis unit to be co-chaired by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. 

The investigation President Obama launches is a major deal. As Mark Ayers of the AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department said, this new investigative team will “hold accountable those who recklessly caused our economic free fall.”
We demanded a strong stand on behalf of working families—and the president heard us. We’ll keep raising our voices. Next time I meet with him, I’m going to deliver each and every note sent by AFL-CIO activists thanking him for listening. Can you add your voice?

Thank President Obama for listening—and urge him to keep it up.

It’s our job to point out when the Obama administration isn’t being aggressive enough for working families. We won’t back down from that, even in an election year. Because we know that good policies are good politics.

That’s why we will continue monitoring the investigation closely. And if criminals aren’t held accountable or underwater homeowners don’t get real relief, we may ask you to take action again. But this is an enormous start—a shot in the arm for accountability. And you helped make it possible.

Thank Obama for listening to us, for holding Big Banks and mortgage fraudsters accountable. Tell him you’ll keep watching the progress.

The mortgage investigation alone marked an important victory for working people. But President Obama’s speech did more.

Our president made it clear that the era of the 1% getting richer by looting the economy is over. He outlined a vision of an America that works for everyone, addressed devastating income inequality, called for investment in jobs and infrastructure, proposed tax rules that aren’t skewed to favor the 1%—and more.

President Obama made it clear that children and our future must be priorities. As Randi Weingarten of the AFT said last night:Obama also made clear tonight what America’s teachers have long understood: We can’t test our way to a middle class; we must educate our way to a middle class....Respecting public school teachers and providing them with the tools and resources they need to help our children learn and grow are essential to building a strong public education system, competing in a global economy and restoring economic opportunity for all.And Obama demanded investment in good, high-paying jobs—and said he would work to bring manufacturing back to America. That’s just what America’s working families need—and just what the members of the United Steelworkers need, said Leo Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers:Strengthening American manufacturing by looking to build good jobs, green jobs and sustainable jobs with American energy, skills and values is a program for us....The president’s commitment to discourage job outsourcing and promote insourcing is a ticket to a better economy.As President Gerald W. McEntee of AFSCME summed up:President Obama presented a comprehensive plan to move our country forward, bolster job creation and find real solutions for the problems confronting our country.In today’s political environment, it takes guts to stand strong with working families—even when we make our voices heard, loud and clear. Because the toxic influence of money in politics—which the president spoke out against last night—is powerful. 

I want to personally show the president what a big difference that kind of leadership makes. Please send the president a note thanking him for listening, and I’ll deliver it soon.
 
Brothers and sisters, there’s much to celebrate in last night’s State of the Union address. President Obama listened to the out-of-work construction worker, to the retired factory worker, to the student serving coffee to help pay for college, to the single mom working two jobs to get by. 

But there’s also much to fear about the state of politics in America today. I need to point out one more thing—and this is important. It may be difficult to hear for some of my Republican friends. But this needs to be said plainly, because this is worse than I’ve ever seen: The national Republican Party—as an institution—is openly and brazenly waging war on workers.

Indiana’s rabidly anti-worker governor, Mitch Daniels, was chosen by GOP leaders to deliver the party’s official response to Obama’s State of the Union address last night. He was chosen at the exact moment that he’s pushing an attack on workers’ rights in Indiana—rights more severe than the one rammed through by Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin. 

This is no coincidence. In today’s Republican Party, attacks like these are celebrated.

The stark contrast between the record and rhetoric of President Obama last night and that of Gov. Daniels—who is pushing to put an end to workers’ rights in Indiana—couldn’t be more profound. 

At this defining moment, working people need to demand that leaders like President Obama continue to draw a clear, unambiguous contrast with the 1% politicians. This is not a moment for sitting on fences, but for bold words and bold action.
 
Please thank President Obama for listening—and let him know you’ll keep making your voice heard.
 
Thank you for all the work you do.

In Solidarity,

Richard L. Trumka
President, AFL-CIO

P.S. Did you miss the speech? Watch it here.
To find out more about the AFL-CIO, please visit our website at www.aflcio.org.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Dear Friend,From 2008 – 2010, despite billions in profits, Verizon paid no federal income taxes.  Anyone that paid even a penny in federal income taxes paid more than Verizon did from 2008 – 2010.  At the same time, Verizon is trying to destroy middle class jobs.Watch Verizon workers in this short video talk about it, then take action!45,000 union workers are fighting to protect middle class jobs at Verizon, which uses corporate tax loopholes to dodge paying taxes at the federal and state levels.  Verizon workers are fighting back.Click here to to watch this short video and sign our petition to Verizon’s greedy executives.CWA is working in coalition with OccupyTheBoardroom, which directs the general public to put pressure on greedy corporate big-wigs. They are highlighting Verizon’s tax-dodging and union-busting.Take action today to stop Verizon’s tax-dodging and their attack on middle class jobs.In Unity,Beth Allen
Online Mobilization CoordinatorYou have received this message through your subscription to a Communications Workers of America e-mail list.
If you did not subscribe or would like to unsubscribe click here.Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC. All Rights Reserved. 501 Third Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 
Featured: State of the Anti-Union 
Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels delivered the response to the State of the Union last night. From his failed economic policies, the auction of Indiana's highways, to his attacks on workers' rights, watch this video to find out what you didn't hear from Governor Daniels last night.Watch the video

Take our E-Update Newsletter Survey. Chance to win $50 credit to the AFSCME store
Help us redesign our E-Update newsletter so we can better communicate with you. Take our short online survey and be automatically entered to win a $50 credit to the AFSCME store.AFSCME E-Update Newsletter Survey 

News From Across The Nation
One Million-Plus Demand Governor Walker’s Recall 
Wisconsin voters seek recall of governor, lieutenant governor and four senators for stripping workers of their collective bargaining rights.Mitt’s 15 percent Tax Rate Highlights Tax Burden of America’s Middle Class
Romney’s speaking fees alone place the mega-millionaire in the top 1 percent nationwide, but he pays a tax rate far lower than the rest of us.Policy Experts: Public Pensions Should Be Strengthened, Not Eliminated
Panel addresses efforts to diminish retirement security for working, middle-class Americans.Victory in Rhode Island
Judge says City of Pawtucket cannot unilaterally cut health benefits promised to retired employees.From the LeadersDon't Blame Government Workers' Pensions
Pres. Gerald W.McEntee writes to USA Today about big players on Wall Street, the devastated economy and retirement savings.Killing Pensions to Benefit the 1 percent
Sec.-Treas. Lee A. Saunders’ latest Huffington Post piece on the push to gut retirement security from millions of middle class workers nationwide.Featured Videos: 2012 Match Game: Presidential Primary Edition 
Test your knowledge on some of the more outrageous statements GOP candidates have said about public employee unions and issues affecting AFSCME members. Play the Match Game

Union Plus Scholarship: Deadline Jan. 31
College scholarships ranging from $500 to $4000 are available to students from AFSCME families. Apply today

AFSCME Web Store: AFSCME Star Knit Beanie
Stay fashionable, even in the cold, with a warm green winter hat. Purchase a winter beanie today

AFSCME Advantage: Solidarity and Savings with Union Carrier AT&T
AT&T is offering a one-time $25 credit on equipment or accessories if you switch your cell phone provider to AT&T. Take advantage of this offer  
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 
GOP State of the Union Response Shows Party's Priority: Beating Up on WorkersMitch Daniels’ response was the first to be delivered from a building surrounded by dozens of police cars and chanting activists, protesting his latest anti-union move.     Read more By Josh Eidelson | AlterNet
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Jan. 25, 2012
Members of the Transport Workers could lose jobs because of Romney’s Bain & Co.—and they’re fighting back.President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address showed the president “listened to the single mom working two jobs to get by, to the out-of-work construction worker” and made clear that the era of the 1 percent getting rich by looting the economy, rather than creating jobs, is over. But Obama alone can’t fix the economy: “Now it’s time for Congress to stop standing in the way of rebuilding our country and act,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka.
Got comments? Post them at blog.aflcio.org. Transport Workers Set to Protest ‘Job Cremator’ Romney Indiana’s Daniels: Opponent of Working People Thanks, Rep. Lewis, for Backing Indiana Working People Indiana Senate Passes RTW Despite Broad Public Opposition iPhone Supplier Equates Workers with ‘1 Million Animals’Read more important news of the day on the issues working families care about.Follow the AFL-CIO:
            Take the next step. Become a mobile activist
by joining the AFL-CIO Rapid Action Text Team.
Text NEWS to AFLCIO (235246) to receive action alerts and more.
(Message and data rates may apply.)
To find out more about the AFL-CIO, please visit our website at www.aflcio.org.
 @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 
Sugar High: The Dark History and Nasty Methods Used to Feed Our Sweet ToothBy Jill Richardson, AlterNetPosted on January 20, 2012, Printed on January 22, 2012http://www.alternet.org/story/153831/sugar_high%3A_the_dark_history_and_nasty_methods_used_to_feed_our_sweet_toothAmericans think an awful lot about sucrose -- table sugar -- but only in certain ways. We crave it and dream up novel ways to combine it with other ingredients to produce delectable foods; and we worry that we eat too much of it and that it is making us unhealthy or fat. But how often do Americans think about where sugar actually comes from or the people who produce it? As a tropical crop, sugarcane cannot grow in most U.S. states. Most of us do not smell the foul odors coming from sugar refineries, look out over vast expanses of nothing but sugarcane, or speak to those who perform the hard labor required to grow and harvest sugarcane.Of course, sugar can be made from beets, a temperate crop, and more than half of sugar produced in the United States is. But globally, most of the story of sugar, past and present, centers around sugarcane, not beets, and as biofuels become more common, it is sugarcane that is cultivated for ethanol. What's more, some conscious eaters avoid beet sugar as most of it is now made from genetically modified sugar beets.While I do not fool myself that sugar is "healthy," if I am going to satisfy my sweet tooth, I prefer cane sugar, maple syrup, agave nectar, or honey over the other choices: beet sugar, high fructose corn syrup, and artificial sweeteners. Of the bunch, most Americans can find only honey and perhaps maple syrup sustainably and locally produced, but cane sugar is often the most versatile product for baking.As a major consumer of cane sugar, I was disturbed to learn the realities of cane sugar production when I visited a sugarcane-producing area in Bolivia.Sugarcane grew as far as the eye could see on the degraded soils of the deforested industrial agricultural area in Bolivia's lowlands. At one point, the van I was riding in got stuck in a traffic jam of enormous trucks, each full of sugarcane, delivering their loads to a refinery. The area around the refinery smelled terrible, and the locals told us the smell came from oxidizing ponds that hold the refinery's wastewater. When the refineries are washed out, typically once a year, the wastewater is dumped into local waterways,resulting in fish kills. This spurred me to learn more about how sugar is made, both in the U.S. and around the world, and how it impacts the land and the people who produce it. Sadly, the story of sugar is also the story of the African slave trade. Today, sugar production still uses exploitative labor practices and can cause serious environmental problems.
Sugar's Rotten HistoryNobody alive today remembers a day when sugar was not a cheap, ubiquitous food in our diets, but historically speaking, it's actually a relatively recent addition to theEuropean diet, one very tightly intertwined with the African slave trade. As Sidney W. Mintz chronicles in his book Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History, when cane sugar first appeared in England in the 12th century, only royalty could afford it, and even then, only in small quantities. This is hardly surprising, considering the journey sugar made to reach England.Sugarcane, a fast-growing tropical grass that reaches 12 to 15 feet high at maturity, was domesticated around 8000 B.C.E. in New Guinea and was carried to India, the Philippines, and perhaps Indonesia some 2,000 years later. By 500 C.E., Indians were making sugar, a process that involves pressing the two-inch-thick cane to extract a dark green juice, rich with nutrients as well as sucrose, then boiling it down to remove liquid and crystalize the sugar. Various processes can be used to refine the sugar so that it is anywhere from a brown color to the chemically pure, white crystal we know today. Of course, until relatively recently, sugar refiners were never able to achieve a mass-produced commodity product so pure that it was completely white.Europeans have the Arabs to thank for their introduction to sugar. Although the Spanish had nothing nice to say about the Moorish occupation of their land, it was the Arabs who introduced sugar production to the European mainland in the seventh and eighth centuries. Arab sugar production likely involved some slave labor, but never on the scale that European sugar production did. European crusaders discovered and took over Arab sugar plantations in the Middle Ages, and from that point forward, sugar production was a job done mostly by slaves.As Europeans figured out more cost-effective ways to mass-produce sugar and transport it to their countries, sugar became within reach of the nobility and then later, within reach of the common people. Mintz tells how three bitter stimulants, each consumed with sugar, reached England at roughly the same time, in the third quarter of the 17th century: tea from Asia, coffee from Africa, and cacao from the Americas. "The success of tea... was also the success of sugar," writes Mintz, "That it was a bitter stimulant, that it was taken hot, and that it was capable of carrying large quantities of palatable sweet calories told importantly in its success."On the production side, the sugar industry briefly moved to the Atlantic islands of Spain and Portugal, and it was here that the use of African slaves was firmly integrated into the business model. In the two decades before Columbus stumbled into the Caribbean, sugarcane production grew by a factor of more than 1,000 on the island of Madeira. There, sugar was produced with slaves.But it was on the island of Sao Tome off the Western coast of central Africa, which harbors mosquitoes carrying both malaria and yellow fever, that resulted in the use of specifically African slaves (as opposed to slaves of other origins). Europeans who came to Sao Tome usually died quickly. And the land was divided into large plantations instead of small parcels. This solidified the model for sugar plantations that was then transferred in the New World and applied to other crops.Columbus brought sugarcane to the Caribbean in 1493, and it was not long before Caribbean islands and Brazil produced sugarcane for export back to Europe -- withAfrican slaves, of course. In 1619, the British brought both slaves and sugarcane to their colony in Jamestown, but sugarcane would not grow in Virginia. Determined to satisfy their sweet tooth with their own colony for sugar, the British took over Barbados soon thereafter.These were also the years of England's industrial revolution, when much of the population transitioned from a peasant diet of eating what they grew to an urban diet of eating what was convenient and cheap, namely bread, accompanied by tea with sugar. Sugar dropped in price during the 18th century and lost its status as a luxury good. Sugar was eaten in tea or in pastries. And, by the 1870s, jam became an important food for the working classes. Between the 15th and 19th centuries, desserts were first introduced to the nobility and then gradually became standard as a sweet course at the end of the meal.All in all, cane sugar consumption grew from an estimated 2 percent of the British diet in 1800 to an estimated 14 percent a century later. Sugar now makes up 20 percent of the American diet. Today most Americans see sugar as a necessity, but most of our ancestors lived entirely without it.Legalized slavery is now long in the past, but sugarcane is still almost universally produced with unjust labor conditions, including modern-day slavery. In Brazil, a study found that, "Modern-day slavery ... is short in duration; the victims are treated as though they were commodities; total power is exercised over the victim, although only temporarily." In 2007, half of Brazil's 5,877 workers freed from slavery -- many of them indigenous -- worked in sugarcane cultivation. Harvesting sugarcane is so arduous that workers can become physically broken after just 10 or 12 years.Whereas modern-day slavery might be the exception, backbreaking work with long hours, low pay, and few benefits (if any) is still the rule. When I visited San Mariano, Isabela, a sugarcane-growing area in the Philippines, the workers were paid as little as one-tenth minimum wage (for weeding) and as much as half of minimum wage for harvesting sugarcane, with a six-day work week and no overtime pay. One worker I met had been injured on the job with no worker's comp for his injury. At that time, he had been out of work and unable to walk for several months without any disability pay. Workers also complained of being compensated for harvesting only if they also loaded the sugarcane into a truck. Occasionally, no truck showed up when the harvest was done, and the workers were never paid for that day's work.Globally, sugarcane covers an area larger than the state of Minnesota, and much of it is harvested manually, even though mechanized harvesting is possible. Sugarcane is a perennial, and plantations typically replant it every four or five harvests, as production declines after each harvest. Mechanical harvesting reduces future yields even further, so when cheap labor is available, it is often more cost-effective than a machine.
America Gets Its FixAn overwhelming percent of world sugar production occurs in Brazil and India, but if you are an American, your sugar fix is likely satisfied by U.S. sugar, whether cane or beet. The U.S. has long had policies that limit sugar imports, keeping the U.S. price of sugar well above the world price -- often double or more. By setting a high tariff on all sugar imports over a set quota, the U.S. protects its own sugar industry (both cane sugar and beet sugar). Producers of high fructose corn syrup also support this system as it allows them to price their product below the cost of sugar, making it attractive as a cheaper alternative.The U.S. can only produce it in a few states, mostly growing it in Florida and Louisiana, with a little bit in Hawaii and Texas. (Hawaii used to grow more before the high real estate prices drove most sugar out of the state.) Together, those four states produce sugarcane on an area just smaller than Rhode Island. Measured by area, this makes up just 1.5 percent of global sugarcane cultivation. Yet, as any discussion with Floridians familiar with the industry will reveal, the area impacted by sugarcane is far larger than just the land planted with the crop. The list of Floridians' complaints usually centers more around the Everglades than around labor issues. (Louisiana's sugar industry is not immune from environmental problems either, but lacks the national outcry to protect the Everglades that shines a spotlight on sugar in Florida.)Sugar in Florida owes its existence to the draining of a large area of the Everglades. As recently as the 1800s, South Florida was dominated by a freshwater wetlandthe size of Delaware, much of it in the form of a 50-mile-wide shallow, slow-moving river. While it was first considered "wasteland," its agricultural potential was realized in the late 1800s, and humanity set to work draining areas using levees, canals and dams. But destructive and deadly storms in the first decades of the 20th century proved that more work was needed if this area was to be safely settled and put to "productive" uses. The Army Corps of Engineers set to work building even more levees, canals and dams to control the water.Thus, by the 1940s, the original Everglades was divided into four areas: the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA), Water Conservation Areas, Big Cypress National Preserve, and Everglades National Park. The Everglades Agricultural Area is home to Florida's sugar industry, and it sits between Lake Okeechobee (the largest freshwater lake in the U.S. after the Great Lakes and the source of the water in the Everglades) and Everglades National Park. Anything that goes into the water in the EAA then flowsinto Everglades National Park and ultimately into the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean. Most consequential is phosphorus fertilizer, which is needed to produce sugar but toxic to the Everglades ecosystem.Americans, especially Floridians, are impacted by sugarcane production by the elevated sugar prices Americans pay, the taxes paid to drain the land and manage the water to meet the industry's needs, the taxes paid to clean up the industry's pollution, and by suffering the consequences of pollution that is not cleaned up at all. John Adornato, regional director of the Sun Coast Region of the National Parks Conservation Association, describes the combined impact of government intervention and the pollution by the sugar industry by saying, "Americans' waistlines are growing due to sugar but their pocketbooks are shrinking."Interestingly, reducing the impacts of sugar production is a cause that both treehuggers and those motivated by economic self-interest can get behind together. Florida's economy revolves around tourism, and tourists flock to Florida because of its natural environment -- but environmental destruction from the sugar industry threatens that."People who live on the east and west coasts of Florida who live on a canal where there are regularly dead fish that surface... how do you sell your house?" asks Adornato. "How do you entice someone to come? How do you entice a retiree who wants to go fishing to come live on a canal where all they can smell and see are dead fish? You go to the beach on your vacation and the red tide on the west coast of Florida produces a stench -- the algae events that happen over there -- no one wants to go over there. You're destroying your fishery, you're killing off coral reefs. You're harming your water supply."These are direct economic effects at every level," he continues. "Over 6 million people, one-third of Floridians, get their water supply from the Everglades. If it's not clean, we are going to have to spend more money to clean it up. Those are the kinds of impacts that we need to deal with. Our economy is a tourism-based economy. If people don't want to come and sit in the beach or they don't want to go fishing, we have seriously harmed our future."Sugar is not the only culprit in harming the Everglades ecosystem or the coastal ecosystems where water from the Everglades drains into the ocean, but it is a major cause of the area's problems along with the cattle and dairy industries situated north of Lake Okeechobee. Fortunately for the Everglades' wading birds whose populations have declined by 90 percent in the last century and a half, Floridians love the Everglades. Activist Tom Sadler noted that even Florida's Republican governor Rick Scott made an appearance at the recent Everglades Coalition Conference, "and he's not the type of person who would go out and hug a tree."His appearance there denotes the political importance of Everglades conservation, if not Scott's commitment to actually achieving it. Sadler said Scott spoke at the conference, "professing his undying commitment to the Everglades although that didn't manifest in any money for the Everglades." That could be because of the enormous influence the industry has on politics. Virginia Chamblee of the Florida Independent reported that, "Big Sugar gave more than $4.2 million to federal candidates and party committees during the 2008 election cycle alone, 63 percent of which went to Democrats."Chamblee writes about Florida Crystals, a subsidiary of sugar giant Flo-Sun: "Companies with ties to Florida Crystals (which has contributed nearly $4.5 million to campaigns since 1991) gave at least $100,000 to now-Gov. Rick Scott's gubernatorial campaign. The head of Florida Crystals also hosted a large campaign fundraiserfor Scott only four weeks after he blasted the company's rival -- U.S. Sugar -- over its role in a planned Everglades restoration project."Flo-Sun is owned by the Fanjul family, called the "First Family of Corporate Welfare" by CNN in 1998. The four Fanjul brothers use a failproof strategy for getting their way from politicians: playing both sides. Alfonso is a major contributor to the Democratic Party, and his influence earned him a role as co-chairman of Bill Clinton's Florida campaign in 1992. Meanwhile, Pepe Fanjul does the same for the Republicans. It cannot hurt that they are strategically positioned in Florida, one of the most crucial swing states in presidential elections.But even the Fanjul's influence cannot dull the nation's love for the Everglades entirely. In 2000, Everglades restoration became a national cause, with the signing of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) by President Clinton. According to its official Web site, "The goal of CERP is to capture fresh water that now flows unused to the ocean and the gulf and redirect it to areas that need it most. The majority of the water will be devoted to environmental restoration, reviving a dying ecosystem. The remaining water will benefit cities and farmers by enhancing water supplies for the south Florida economy."Naturally, the Everglades experiences a very wet rainy season from about May to November, and a very dry season during the rest of the year. In the wet season, wildlife likedeer take refuge on "tree islands" to stay above the water; in the dry season, fish and other aquatic animals are concentrated into holes dug by alligators that retain water, providing a veritable feast for any predator looking for a meal. The Everglades needs these natural cycles, but the people of Florida need water year-round. With its drained agricultural land, the Everglades system now holds less water overall than it used to, sending any excess water out to tide. And since Florida lacks deep aquifers, the plentiful rainfall received in the rainy season is mostly not stored for use during the dry season.Adornato feels that CERP is spending extra money on risky projects in order to store water without harming the sugar industry. He is critical of the plans to use Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) wells, which entail injecting water deep into the ground during the rainy season for use during the dry season. He prefers the approach of former Republican Governor Charlie Crist who, he says, "pretty much expended all of his political capital," in an effort to acquire the land of U.S. Sugar Corporation to use it for water storage and cleanup, delivering clean water to the Everglades.Crist's plan, first announced in 2008, initially proposed purchasing 187,000 acres for $1.75 billion. By 2010, the area was reduced to 26,800 acres, or 14 percent of the original area, and the cost was down to $197 million. However, a 2010 New York Times article revealed that the deal might have helped U.S. Sugar Corporation as much or more as it helped the Everglades: "United States Sugar dictated many of the terms of the deal as state officials repeatedly made decisions against the immediate needs of the Everglades and the interests of taxpayers."The initial deal would have put U.S. Sugar, which was mired in debt, out of business by purchasing all of its land, but the downsized deal leaves it in business but sells off its citrus groves, which were not profitable for citrus anymore (and some say are useless for restoration) due to a plant disease epidemic. U.S. Sugar was represented in the deal's negotiations by Gunster, a law firm whose chairman, George LeMieux, was Governor Crist's chief of staff.Understanding how various restoration schemes will affect both the Everglades and Florida's sugar industry (which enjoys a symbiotic relationship with both major American political parties) is complex, but even those who care deeply for the Everglades understand the issue in the context of believing sugar is a necessity. Adornato says that he does not simply have a sweet tooth, he has "sweet teeth," and sugar has to come from somewhere. "The bottom line is that sugar grown in Florida does not pay the consequences for its impact."Sadler, who unsuccessfully campaigned to assess a penny per pound "polluter pays" fee on sugar companies, agrees, noting that if sugar is not grown in Florida, where we have some environmental and worker protections, it will be grown elsewhere in the world where conditions may be worse.While sugar consumption is not a necessity, production is going up, not down, given the popularity of biofuels and the relative efficiency of sugarcane compared to other feedstocks. But perhaps the answer is not giving up sugar but reducing our intake to reduce its ecological footprint as well. Sugar ranks alongside factory farmed animal products as unsustainably produced foods that Americans eat in quantities greater than are healthy.Likewise, both foods benefit from lax federal environmental standards that stick taxpayers with the bill to clean up pollution or simply force citizens to live with a mess that is never cleaned up, and producers of both foods benefit from federal commodity policies that make their products more profitable. Most of all, both tell of a broken political process in which the needs of the majority are overlooked as long as a powerful and wealthy few finance the political campaigns of both Democrats and Republicans.  Jill Richardson is the founder of the blog La Vida Locavore and a member of the Organic Consumers Association policy advisory board. She is the author of Recipe for America: Why Our Food System Is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It..

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Will the Young Rise Up and Fight Their Indentured Servitude to the Student Loan Industry?The solution to class exploitation and abuse is always the same: Get conscious, get angry, get energized, and get organized.READ MOREBruce E. Levine / AlterNet @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 
Not all jobs are equal
A lower unemployment rate isn't enough.
Americans need work that pays the bills.
By Jonathan Tasini
Los Angeles Times
January 24, 2012
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-tasini-high-unemployment-is-just-part-of-the-20120124,0,4204870.story

Politicians bickering over private equity's impact on
jobs and how to bring down the high unemployment rate
are entirely missing the point about the crisis facing
working Americans. The predicament we face isn't simply
that there are too few jobs; it's also that an
increasing number of workers don't have the kind of job
that can pay the bills.

While productivity has grown by more than 80% over the
last 30 years, wages have effectively been flat for 80%
of Americans. So, although we're making stuff faster
and more efficiently, the benefits of that hard work
have not trickled into the pockets of the people who do
it.

Let's turn first to the intensifying debate over Mitt
Romney's role as a private equity manager. It's of
course ludicrous that Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry --
two veteran advocates of a vehemently anti-union,
free-market agenda that laid the foundation for the
newly coined "vulture capitalism" -- condemned those
principles while campaigning in New Hampshire and South
Carolina.

But equally absurd is Romney's defense that, at the end
of the day, his company, Bain Capital, created more
jobs than it destroyed. Even if he's telling the truth
by some measures, the fact is that private equity
buyouts often enrich those who arrange them by sharp
cost-cutting, including dismantling pay and benefits
for most of the workers who remain or new hires who
join the more "efficient" enterprise. It's simple math:
To service the huge debt taken on in virtually every
buyout, workers take cuts. And the new jobs aren't
necessarily a path to the American dream.

Take Staples, which Romney trumpets as one of his
successes. The company certainly pays some of its
employees well: Staples Chairman and Chief Executive
Ronald L. Sargent received a total pay package of more
than $15 million in 2010. But jobs in retail -- one of
the fastest-growing job sectors in recent decades --
tend to pay poorly, and Staples jobs don't seem to be
an exception to that rule.

Although the company doesn't publish its wage scale,
the website glassdoor.com, which allows workers to post
their salaries anonymously to try to give a picture of
wages at a company, suggests that the average Staples
sales associate or EasyTech associate makes less than
$9 an hour. An employee working a 40-hour week, 52
weeks a year at that rate would make significantly less
than the 2010 federal poverty level threshold for a
family of four of $22,314. So, although Romney likes to
claim credit for creating jobs, he needs to be asked
how many of those jobs were ones that allowed employees
to make ends meet.

And even that question doesn't get at another issue:
the number of jobs that were lost as the growth of
Staples and similar companies drove mom-and-pop
stationery shops and office supply stores across the
country out of business.

Republicans, though, aren't alone in muddying the
waters. A few days ago, the president held a political
photo op, praising several companies for bringing back
jobs from overseas: so-called in-sourcing. But he did
not address two ugly truths -- and the uninformed, lazy
news media did not demand he do so.

(For the entirearticle go to http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-tasini-high-unemployment-is-just-part-of-the-20120124,0,4204870.story)
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@  







Material appearing here is distributed without profit or monitory gain to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the material for research and educational purposes. This is in accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. section 107..
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
 

Listen to Native Voice One http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/nv1/ppr/index.shtml



 
 


 













































  		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/educationforall/attachments/20120125/f838a44e/attachment-0001.htm>