[HacktionLab] question about IRC at climate camp
Mike Harris
mike at slackmail.co.uk
Tue Oct 28 11:51:51 GMT 2008
Hi Mark,
The satellite dish has a range of IPs available, up to 5. These are
public IPs and in theory the network could be set up so that a bridge is
used instead of a router for up to 5 machines publically.
However, we need far more than that, so the satellite modem is then
connected to a router (in this case a Draytek router) that then handed
out IPs using DHCP.
Therefore to the IRC server everything was coming from the same IP.
The only think that I can think of would be to use OpenVPN to allow
folks to remotely get into a machine on the net with a valid public IP
address. But this seems overkill.
Is it not possible on IRC to control access to a channel based on nick
for example? Or perhaps just set it to allow access from the same given
IP multiple times?
In short I see it as an IRC server admin issue, rather than a local
networking issue. As I think that'll be easier to solve for all
instances.....
Mike.
Mark Ruddell wrote:
> Hi everyone, and thanks for coming to Leeds. It was great to meet you.
>
> I was looking through the minutes and wondering about the way IRC was
> set up for despatch at CC. I don't know much about IRC but I was
> wondering whether an alternative solution to the one-client-per-IP
> problem (I'm assuming this means the satellite link uses NAT?) would
> have been to run an IRC (or other IM) server on-site? This would mean
> that every host would have a unique IP on the LAN, no need for
> tunnelling etc.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
_______________________________________________
Hacktionlab mailing list
Hacktionlab at lists.psand.net
http://lists.psand.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
--
----------
Mike Harris
Mobile UK: +44 (0) 7811 671 893
PGP: http://mbharris.co.uk/mike.gpg.pub
More information about the Hacktionlab
mailing list