[HacktionLab] general proposal to network x

[JimDog]

Fully agree with this, though signing off as indymedia is problematic. I'd suggest instead signing it as 'various UK indymedia collectives' or 'Northern, London, bristol, oxford sheffield and nottingham indymedias' (provided they agree of course) since they have representatives on this list.

Either that or send an email to the UK list asking for anyone who objects to us signing as the UK indymedia collectives to speak or hold their peace before Saturday

Jimdog

http://northern-indymedia.org

----- Reply message -----
From: "m3shrom" <m3shrom at riseup.net>
Date: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 15:03
Subject: [HacktionLab] general proposal to network x
To: <hacktionlab at lists.psand.net>

hi there,

I reckon we should make a bit of a proposal to network x which can be
built around the tech tools for activists booklet.

Personally I think it makes sense to keep it pretty vague and
'aspirational'

Here's an attempt at it.

--//--

General Proposal from Hacktionlab / Indymedia / Aktivix

Our proposal is that Network X should encourage the use of
communications tools which make it more difficult for the prosecution
and or surveillance of those organising or attending activities.

An additional proposal is to dissuade member groups or try to move away
from using online organising tools which keep a track of your details
and can be taken away from you.

A technical summary of what this means in practice can be found in the
Tech Tools for Activists leaflet which will be distributed at the
gathering. There’s an updated version here.
http://www.booki.cc/tech-tools-for-activists/_full

_______________________________________________
HacktionLab mailing list
HacktionLab at lists.psand.net
http://lists.psand.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.psand.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/hacktionlab/attachments/20110111/e5e18065/attachment.htm>