[HacktionLab] survey Qs

[mark]

Thanks Valentina,

I was kind of leaving the CO2 calculation "as an exercise for the
reader" but there's a decent one here (but don't be conned into buying
their offset products):

http://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx

- or I think there was a way to do it in google maps, last time I
looked, or the AA website, or cyclestreets I think.

I'm glad you like it :)

Mark


encosianima:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> +10 for your survey proposal
> 
> Ciao!
> 
> Valentina
> 
> PS (impressed by the footprint calculation point, is it possible to
> obtain that?)
> 
> 
> On 16/06/17 06:59, mark wrote:
>> I've been thinking about what questions to ask, in order to obtain
>> information that will be of greatest value in guiding us for future
>> efforts. Here's what I've got so far (people may think of others or
>> disagree?)
>>
>>
>> 1. How did you find out about barncamp?
>>
>> [will guide our publicity effort next time]
>>
>> - a friend IRL
>> - a friend online
>> - saw a poster/flier (where...?)
>> - facebook
>> - Dissident Island Radio
>> - the HL mailing list
>> - another mailing list (which...?)
>> - a decentralised online service (which...?)
>> - other (...)
>>
>>
>> 2. How easy did you find the registration & payment process?
>> - Likert scale
>> - comments about registration
>>
>>
>> 3. Please estimate the carbon footprint of your travel to & from
>> barncamp in kg CO2 (eq) (integer)
>>
>>
>> 4. How much did you like the site?
>> - Likert scale
>> - comments about site
>>
>>
>> 5. How did you rate the catering (food & bar)?
>> - Likert scale
>> - comments about catering
>>
>>
>> 6. Did you present or run a timetabled session (y/n)?
>>
>> If Y:
>> - rate the adequacy of the facilities (Likert)
>> - what (if anything) would you like to change about the facilities?
>> (text)
>>
>> If N:
>> - what would have made it possible for you to lead a session? (text)
>>
>>
>> 7. Considering the things that happened in the timetabled sessions you
>> went to, what was your favourite moment? (text)
>>
>>
>> 8. How technical did you find the content of the workshops?
>> *Not nearly technical enough
>> *Not technical enough
>> *About right
>> *Too technical
>> *Way too technical
>>
>>
>> 9. How policitically/socially important did you find the content of the
>> workshops?
>> *Not nearly political enough
>> *Not political enough
>> *About right
>> *Too political
>> *Way too political
>>
>>
>> 10. Considering the things that happened outside the timetabled
>> sessions, what was your favourite moment? (text)
>>
>>
>> 11. Here are some of the things that people might like about barncamp.
>> Please rate their importance to you personally, starting with '1' as the
>> most important.
>>
>> _ learning about tech generally
>> _ learning about politically problematic tech
>> _ developing our solutions to problematic tech
>> _ working on our own DIY tech agenda (not as a response to externals)
>> _ thinking about tech politics
>> _ thinking about politics generally
>> _ meeting like-minded people
>> _ sharing a special insight you've got
>> _ building movement/s
>> _ getting help with a specific tech problem
>> _ other
>>
>>
>> 12. Apart from the questions above, what else could we improve about the
>> event?
>>
>>
>> 13. When would you like to come to barncamp next?
>> 2018/2019/never (why?)
>>
>>
>> 14. Do you have any ideas for a future event?
>>
>>
>> 15. Would you like to be more involved in organising the next BarnCamp?
>> Please tick the box and make sure you enter your contact details so that
>> we can get in touch.
>>
>>
>> 16.  When helping to plan another BarnCamp what would you like to do?
>> Outreach and promotion
>> Finances
>> Managing sign-ups
>> Overall production
>> Workshop planning and scheduling
>> Food planning
>> Entertainment planning
>> Site planning
>> Site electrics
>> Site network and comms
>> General comms with attendees
>>
>>
>> 17. How could we organise in a way that makes it easier for you to
>> volunteer effectively?
>>
>>
>> Anyone got any others? I'm mindful that we may need to trim down to a
>> manageable length after piloting.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HacktionLab mailing list
>> HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HacktionLab mailing list
> HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/hacktionlab/attachments/20170616/503ac043/attachment.sig>