[HacktionLab] survey Qs

Encosianima encosianima at riseup.net
Mon Jun 19 11:04:09 UTC 2017


+1

Thanks! It seems we got the tool so

Ciao
Vale

⁣Knowledge is distributed across a network of connections, and therefore that
learning consists of the ability to construct and traverse those networks” (Downes, 2012).​

On 19 Jun 2017, 10:33, at 10:33, ale <a at 414c45.net> wrote:
>Hi there!
>Drupal's Webform module includes some basic analysis of submissions,
>but
>it's pretty basic, imho. You can do more complex things, as nice
>visualizations, rendering webforms through a view and using
>Visualization API module (this last one is a beta in drupal-8.x).
>
>Best,
>Ale.
>
>On 19/06/17 10:06, encosianima wrote:
>> Hi all!
>> 
>> I'll investigate about Drupal form, but I'd say it's a simple form
>(to
>> collect data).
>> 
>> I'm not a data analyst ( only experienced into survey design) and for
>> the purpose of getting sense from data a statistics tool is needed.
>> There's PSPP but still someone needs to know how to use it (again a
>data
>> analyst).
>> 
>> On the other hand there's  surveymonkey (free version only allow 10
>> questions/100 people questionnaire) and google form (no limits).
>> Completely free (be the best option imho)
>> 
>> Tom: since we discussed a bit about the survey Qs, who participated
>this
>> discussions (theoretically everyone on this list) won't be in the
>> position to pilot the survey :D
>> 
>> Ciao!
>> 
>> Vale
>> 
>> 
>> On 18/06/17 23:50, Tom Lord wrote:
>>> Maybe I'm missing the point - is there / could there be separate
>lists
>>> for this-year's-barncamp-attendees and hacktionlab?
>>>
>>>    Original Message
>>> From: mark
>>> Sent: Sunday, 18 June 2017 23:16
>>> To:hacktionlab at lists.aktivix.org
>>> Subject: Re: [HacktionLab] survey Qs
>>>
>>> Are you happy with Drupal Forms Vale? Does it include the tools you
>>> want? I had imagined we'd just get a .csv dump and analyse in
>>> libreoffice calc or something... can you guide us here?
>>>
>>> I know a couple of people who came to barncamp but aren't on this
>list,
>>> so they would be blind to this discussion and I could possibly coax
>into
>>> piloting a form and timing themselves.
>>>>>> I'm happy to follow your lead here :)
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> encosianima:
>>>> Hi guys!
>>>>
>>>> Usually best think to do is implement Qs in a form (which possibly
>>>> offers/includes data analysis tools) and run it as a pilot with one
>or
>>>> two tester(s) before spreading final version.
>>>>
>>>> I've got some experience in the field and I'd be happy to give an
>hand.
>>>>
>>>> Ciao!
>>>>
>>>> Vale
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18/06/17 12:04, Mike Harris wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>> All good questions. I think perhaps though we ought to try to get
>the
>>>>> number down to, say, 10. It good to be concise rather than gather
>too
>>>>> much information, as then we'll have a job on our hands processing
>and
>>>>> interpreting it.
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards question 3 about the carbon footprint one, I really
>>>>> cannot see the relevance of this question at all. Like what are we
>>>>> supposed to do with those figures except say to ourselves that
>"yes
>>>>> people who live further away or drove probably have a bigger
>carbon
>>>>> footprint than those that didn't". We know this already. Can we
>drop
>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Question 4 about whether people liked the site is interesting to
>know,
>>>>> but again, unless we propose to change site in the future, not
>sure if
>>>>> it's handy to know. We have done 7 events there thus far. The big
>>>>> issue with it being accessibility. The big issue with finding
>another
>>>>> site is finding it, and making sure that we can still more or less
>run
>>>>> the event under the radar as a private gathering without loads of
>>>>> paperwork and cost.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than the above, nice one. Do you or someone on this here
>list
>>>>> fancy getting the questionnaire set up, once we've agreed the
>>>>> questions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> El 16/06/2017 a les 06:59, mark ha escrit:
>>>>>> I've been thinking about what questions to ask, in order to
>obtain
>>>>>> information that will be of greatest value in guiding us for
>future
>>>>>> efforts. Here's what I've got so far (people may think of others
>or
>>>>>> disagree?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. How did you find out about barncamp?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [will guide our publicity effort next time]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - a friend IRL
>>>>>> - a friend online
>>>>>> - saw a poster/flier (where...?)
>>>>>> - facebook
>>>>>> - Dissident Island Radio
>>>>>> - the HL mailing list
>>>>>> - another mailing list (which...?)
>>>>>> - a decentralised online service (which...?)
>>>>>> - other (...)
>>>>>> 2. How easy did you find the registration & payment process?
>>>>>> - Likert scale
>>>>>> - comments about registration
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. Please estimate the carbon footprint of your travel to & from
>>>>>> barncamp in kg CO2 (eq) (integer)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4. How much did you like the site?
>>>>>> - Likert scale
>>>>>> - comments about site
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5. How did you rate the catering (food & bar)?
>>>>>> - Likert scale
>>>>>> - comments about catering
>>>>>> 6. Did you present or run a timetabled session (y/n)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If Y:
>>>>>> - rate the adequacy of the facilities (Likert)
>>>>>> - what (if anything) would you like to change about the
>facilities?
>>>>>> (text)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If N:
>>>>>> - what would have made it possible for you to lead a session?
>(text)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7. Considering the things that happened in the timetabled
>sessions you
>>>>>> went to, what was your favourite moment? (text)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8. How technical did you find the content of the workshops?
>>>>>> *Not nearly technical enough
>>>>>> *Not technical enough
>>>>>> *About right
>>>>>> *Too technical
>>>>>> *Way too technical
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 9. How policitically/socially important did you find the content
>of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> workshops?
>>>>>> *Not nearly political enough
>>>>>> *Not political enough
>>>>>> *About right
>>>>>> *Too political
>>>>>> *Way too political
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 10. Considering the things that happened outside the timetabled
>>>>>> sessions, what was your favourite moment? (text)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 11. Here are some of the things that people might like about
>barncamp.
>>>>>> Please rate their importance to you personally, starting with '1'
>>>>>> as the
>>>>>> most important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _ learning about tech generally
>>>>>> _ learning about politically problematic tech
>>>>>> _ developing our solutions to problematic tech
>>>>>> _ working on our own DIY tech agenda (not as a response to
>externals)
>>>>>> _ thinking about tech politics
>>>>>> _ thinking about politics generally
>>>>>> _ meeting like-minded people
>>>>>> _ sharing a special insight you've got
>>>>>> _ building movement/s
>>>>>> _ getting help with a specific tech problem
>>>>>> _ other
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 12. Apart from the questions above, what else could we improve
>>>>>> about the
>>>>>> event?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 13. When would you like to come to barncamp next?
>>>>>> 2018/2019/never (why?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 14. Do you have any ideas for a future event?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 15. Would you like to be more involved in organising the next
>>>>>> BarnCamp?
>>>>>> Please tick the box and make sure you enter your contact details
>so
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> we can get in touch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16. When helping to plan another BarnCamp what would you like to
>do?
>>>>>> Outreach and promotion
>>>>>> Finances
>>>>>> Managing sign-ups
>>>>>> Overall production
>>>>>> Workshop planning and scheduling
>>>>>> Food planning
>>>>>> Entertainment planning
>>>>>> Site planning
>>>>>> Site electrics
>>>>>> Site network and comms
>>>>>> General comms with attendees
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 17. How could we organise in a way that makes it easier for you
>to
>>>>>> volunteer effectively?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone got any others? I'm mindful that we may need to trim down
>to a
>>>>>> manageable length after piloting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> HacktionLab mailing list
>>>>>> HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
>>>>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
>>>>> -- 
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Harris . XtreamLab
>>>>> w:https://xtreamlab.net
>>>>> e:mike.harris at xtreamlab.net
>>>>> t: 07811 671 893
>>>>> s: adelayde
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> HacktionLab mailing list
>>>>> HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
>>>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> HacktionLab mailing list
>>>> HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
>>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HacktionLab mailing list
>>> HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> HacktionLab mailing list
>> HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
>> 
>
>-- 
>ale [414c45.net · wwb.cc · @414c45]
>
>_______________________________________________
>HacktionLab mailing list
>HacktionLab at lists.aktivix.org
>https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/hacktionlab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/hacktionlab/attachments/20170619/0bab418f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the HacktionLab mailing list