[HacktionLab] Anonymous survey tech?

[Michael Rogers]

On 11/12/2018 10:51, Charlie Harvey wrote:
> On 10/12/2018 17:47, naomi wrote:
>> Thanks Charlie
>>
>> But it seems to me you'd have to store the IP in order to do that, as
>> you would have to compare the IP of each submission with the previous
>> ones in order to decide which integer to give it.
> 
> Hi naomi,
> 
> Yep you do have to keep track of the integer, but that doesn't need you
> to futz with IP addresses that I can see.
> 
> Given you have to store your responses anyway, you could just use the
> row id in your database to store it and rely on your database to
> increment it.

How does this detect multiple responses from the same person, which was
the reason for suggesting storing the hashed IP address?

Cheers,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x11044FD19FC527CC.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 17053 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/hacktionlab/attachments/20181211/8c7b5dc9/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/hacktionlab/attachments/20181211/8c7b5dc9/attachment-0001.sig>