From wf at world-foundation.org Tue Jun 8 23:54:04 2004 From: wf at world-foundation.org (SN World Foundation) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:54:04 +0200 Subject: [imc-uk-emergency] New Technology for the Third World, June 2004 Message-ID: <20040608225402.36CB12BAAB9@world-foundation.org> New Technology for the Third World, June 2004 Production Mini-plants in mobile containers. Worldwide Partners program SN World Foundation will supply to countries and developing regions the technology and necessary support for production in series of Mini-plants in mobile containers (40-foot). The Mini-plant system is designed in such a way that all the production machinery is fixed on the platform of the container, with all wiring, piping, and installation parts; that is, they are fully equipped... and the mini-plant is ready for production." More than 700 portable production systems: Bakeries, Water purification, Dehydrated food, Steel Nails, Fruit juice preparation, Tire Retreading, Reinforcement Bar Bending for Construction Framework, Sheeting for Roofing, Ceilings and Fa?ades, Plated Drums, Aluminum Buckets, Injected Polypropylene Housewares, Pressed Melamine Items (Glasses, Cups, Plates, Mugs, etc.), Mufflers, Construction Electrically Welded Mesh, Plastic Bags and Packaging, Medical assistance mobile units, Sanitary Material, Hypodermic Syringes, Hemostatic Clamps, etc. SN World Foundation has started a Co-investment program for the installation of small Assembly plants to manufacture in series the Mini-plants of portable production on site, region or country where required. One of the most relevant features is the fact that these plants will be connected to the International Trade System, with access to more than 50 million raw materials, products and services and automatic transactions for world trade. Due to financial reasons, involving cost and social impact, the best solution is setting up assembly plants on the same countries and regions, using local resources (labor, some equipment, etc.) SN World Foundation participates at 50% (fifty percent) for investment of each Assembly plant. If you are interested in being a partner in your country or region, you can send your CV to: SN World Foundation (click here) Worldwide Partners Program By Sarah Mathews, Manager Program ------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you received this in error or would like to be removed from our list, please return us indicating: remove or un-subscribe in subject field, Thanks. Manager Program ? 2004 SN World Foundation. All rights reserved. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/imc-uk-emergency/attachments/20040609/d5a1b926/attachment.html From planet-mail at pop3.poptel.org.uk Tue Jun 15 20:59:51 2004 From: planet-mail at pop3.poptel.org.uk (Planet Mail) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:59:51 +0100 Subject: [imc-uk-emergency] seems lists are down Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.1.20040615205502.0808c748@pop3.poptel.org.uk> hiya, seems indy lists are down - if you need quick response for anything at the moment advise contacting people direct. by the way - i do like the name of this list ;-) ciao, dave From zcat at ametrika.com Tue Jun 15 23:37:33 2004 From: zcat at ametrika.com (zcat at ametrika.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:37:33 -0600 Subject: [imc-uk-emergency] (london audio)tomorrows outro In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.1.20040615205502.0808c748@pop3.poptel.org.uk> References: <6.0.0.22.1.20040615205502.0808c748@pop3.poptel.org.uk> Message-ID: <20040615223733.17622.qmail@mojojojo.andenken.com> outro 4 tomorrows show is 16.57 mins long 1st peice global warming /day after tomorrow 2nd peice black latino pride 3rd music poison girls (if there is one we can use it next week) i think this is a cracker chris should have it if not ring me Andrew From gdm at fifthhorseman.net Wed Jun 16 12:46:20 2004 From: gdm at fifthhorseman.net (garcondumonde) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:46:20 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [imc-uk-emergency] Re: [Imc-uk-features] [article:293456] infactual? and... Message-ID: <1305.210.50.69.154.1087386380.squirrel@210.50.69.154> **note: re-sent to imc-uk-emergency as lists down/slow** hi, i've read through this post and all the comments (there are a number subsequent to ekes' comment). the majority are in favour of NOT hiding the article. i have hidden it. Why?? there are a number of reasons. i will post a short comment under the article linking to this email as well.... 1. firstly, i agree with the comment ekes made about mental health problems: > There is a __serious__ issue around mental health, schools and exam stresses. This article fails to highlight these issues because it names individuals. Reporting, and campaigning, must highlight the many people involved and doesn't need names. teenagers are under an enormous amount of stress that is often unrecognised. adolescent girls are pretty much at the peak of the iceberg in terms of numbers of attempted suicide: they do it more than anybody else (although fortunately they are less successful than their male counterparts). 2. there appears - from comments posted under the article and from surfing various other BBs found thru google.co.uk - to be some variance in the details around the story. it is not entirely clear what happened when, and the story is merely attributed to "my sources" - hardly a descriptive account of what role/credibility those people may have. 3. kathryn blair has already been found involved in disputes over stories about her in the press: "39. Blair MP v Mail on Sunday (Report 47, 1999)" http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmcumeds/458/3032509.htm "...the Commission noted the Code's responsibility to protect vulnerable children. In this case, it considered that Kathryn would start school at the centre of a row over the validity of her admission and felt that the story therefore had significantly affected her welfare at a particularly crucial time.... it considered that the article was in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Code of Practice. It therefore followed that, because the article was misleading, there could be no public interest in its contents. The breach of Clause 1 necessarily would demonstrate a breach of Clause 6 (Children) in that untrue allegations connected to a child would automatically harm her welfare and obviate the public interest defence. The Commission?in line with the precedents set out in Section 1?also noted the extent to which Mr and Mrs Blair had gone to protect the privacy of their daughter." i think this is an interesting reference because it, legitimately, raises questions about press adherence to a voluntary code of conduct (please correct me if i am wrong about any of the details: i am neither a lawyer nor a journalist!) regarding personal privacy - including the privacy of a child - in a public arena. there are implications for indymedia, too... by following the logic presented in this quote (and the full reference, which is only a few lines longer), i think that the article should be hidden: there is not enough evidence that it is correct and i think that the article could be more damaging. [nb. a medical definition of childhood in the uk includes all those under the age of 16 and those up to the age of 18 who remain in full-time education] My suggestion would be that the article is perhaps re-written, anonymising the name of the child (although i would agree that the public interest may be served best by stating "there are rumours that one of tony blair's children attempted suicide last month" or something similar) in order that this important aspect of our society can be highlighted. i note that the article is printed in full on tony gosling's own website, The All Seeing Eye - http://www.public-interest.co.uk/aseye/index.htm and i am not trying to suggest that that should be changed as i have no place to do so. i do find, however, that it is interesting that one of the links from the article on that website is to "Ethical guidance on the reporting of suicide" - http://www.presswise.org.uk/display_page.php?id=166 from there, i quickly reached guidelines which talked about "suicide contagion" and also raised as a concern the fact that, "Using adolescents on TV or in print media to tell the stories of their suicide attempts may be harmful to the adolescents themselves or may encourage other vulnerable young people to seek attention in this way." i finish with another quote from ekes: > We want to change things, for the better. Lets tackle issues of mental health properly. Lets not point fingers at people without talking to them. Lets involve people in changing things. love & solidarity, --gdm nb. i would like to remind everyone that no article is removed from www.indymedia.org.uk - they are all visible by following the 'view all posts' link which can be found on the editorial guidelines page, http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/static/editorial.html From admsupport at address.com Sat Jun 26 03:56:38 2004 From: admsupport at address.com (Logan Medeiros) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 02:56:38 -0000 Subject: [imc-uk-emergency] Re: ..advertising for your organization Message-ID: Email Advertise to 28 Million People Free http://www.broadcastingtoday.biz emailing is only zero amount if you are a non profit organization that aids low income individuals gain access to the internet. at web site, contact us by mail for further details. unsubscribe from our non-commercial/non-profit newsletter database: http://www.broadcastingtoday.biz/unsub.html contact us at: po box 1259, seattle, wa 98111