[LAF] 8th and 2:30

[steve ash]

Yes, sorry got a bit muddled about that 2pm was right.
Wasn't aware of Christian's moderating job. Presumably
thats why he prefered 1 and 3rd Sats for LAF. This is
exactly why we need a real world meeting, the
information flow on this kind of list is inadequate. 


--- LONDON EVENTS <londonevents2004 at yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

> Steve
> The Ref to 230 was for JUSTINS talk if he could do
> it on 
> 8th OCT   your talk   24th Sep[ has been advertised
> at 2pm as you rerquested
> when you said you preferred 2nd and 4th Sat and a 2
> rather than 3pm start
> 230 was a suggested compromise  ( for post Blake
> talks)with Christian prefering 3pm but I think the
> talks he moderates are on 1st and 3rd Sats so 2pm
> might be ok
> so confirm statr time for 24th as 2pm ( appreciate
> you might be a bit late)  
> Ed
> 
> 
> steve ash <steveash_2001 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> >STEVE can you make the 8th? IF YES Justin could
> >give his postponed 
> >talk (IS THAT OK JUSTIN) Would a 230 start be ok
> >as a compromise between 
> >your desire for an earlier start and Christian
> >haveing to arrive from 
> >another meeting?
> 
> 2:30 is ok but would arrive late mostly and could
> only
> do Blake talk at 3pm. But 2:30 ok by me.
> 
> The 8th? I'm not sure what you mean? 8th Oct?
> Possibly
> not but could try.....
> 
> 
> 



		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com