[LAF] rights
VolodyA! V Anarhist
Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org
Thu Jul 23 17:43:48 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> Ed McArthur wrote:
>> I have taken the precaution of spell checking this post
>
>> Joy is NOT calling anyone a "sexual receptacle" she is saying that that
>> is how people involved in the sex industry/ are being used/ which is
>> quite different , its also how the capitalists who run the sex industry
>> and the customers of the sex industry see
>> sex workers especially female sex workers.
>
> It is Joy and not clients who see sex workers that way. I watch shit loads of
> porn, and thus can be qualified by your 'client' label, i even pay for one
> pornographic web-site for the membership. I do not see people who are there as
> 'sex receptacles' and neither is that type of opinion tolerated on the web-site
> (that rule is explicitly stated). The only people who i have heard express such
> beliefs are anti-sex feminists.
For the people who want to check out the rules for themselves:
http://www.vegporn.com/board/showthread.php?t=8
>> You have failed to address in any way the question of misogyny
>> without which there would be no demand for prostitution or porn
>
> I address it quite directly. I openly say that 'question' (more of an assumption
> really) is false.
>
>> Why are you so sure such attitudes would persists in a future Society ,
>> thereby creating the demand for "Voluntary" sex work ?
>
>> I am more concerned however about the present (2009)
>> Today Joy pointed out to me that Just down the road from
>> where I live there is a large poster advertising cosmetic surgery for
>> Woman and promoting the idea of this being a good(and no doubt as a
>> subtext necessary) thing
>> My res pone ? " In 2009" ( I also plan to subvert that particular ad)
>
>> This is another example of misogyny the idea
>> that women need to have cosmetic surgery to /improve /themselves for
>> the benefit of men
>
> That is a loaded assumption. It *is* a problem that we have to 'improve'
> ourselves constantly in the capitalist society, in order to create the rat-race
> culture. But as that has fuck all to do with sex work, i did not address it.
> There are also problems of diminishing water supplies in Africa, but we are also
> not discussing those in relation to sex work, are we?
>
>> Your whole position fails to address the question of why such attitudes
>> persist and how to educate against them, you seem
>> to want to accommodate them and then spin them out using the language of
>> freedom and choice and accusing those who do
>> of opposing those things and being anti sex to boot
>
>> Ed
>
> Your final statements are also false. I have started the whole discussion with
> the acknowledgement that prostitution is a part of capitalist society, and as
> such needs to stop. In the same way as restaurants and universities need to stop
> existing. But i am not going to advertise the idea that we need to 're-educate'
> those who cook food or prepare lectures. What we do need to do (in 2009) is to
> remove the stigma associated with the people (for example about calling them
> 'sexual receptacles').
>
> - Volodya
>
>> Ed McArthur 07981 900 563 Nestlé-Free small
>> <http://www.babymilkaction.org/resources/boycott/nestlefree.html>
>
>> <http://www.babymilkaction.org/resources/boycott/nestlefree.html>
>> *www.eventsandissues.bravehost.com
>> <http://www.eventsandissues.bravehost.com/>*
>> *see also*
>> *www.freewebs.com/bookevents <http://www.freewebs.com/bookevents>*
>> *Conway Hall Sunday Concerts*
>> *www.conwayhallsundayconcerts.org.uk
>> <http://www.conwayhallsundayconcerts.org.uk/>*
>> *www.freewebs.com/secularcivilrights
>> <http://www.freewebs.com/secularcivilrights>*
>> ****
>> * <http://www.freewebs.com/secularcivilrights>*
>> **
>> * *
>
>
>
>
>> --- On *Thu, 7/23/09, VolodyA! V Anarhist
>> /<Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org>/* wrote:
>
>
>> From: VolodyA! V Anarhist <Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org>
>> Subject: Re: [LAF] rights
>> To: "List - London Anarchist Forum" <laf at lists.aktivix.org>
>> Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 12:10 PM
>
>> Joy Wood wrote:
>>> Putting aside for the moment the fact the subject - ie, that in
>>> prostitution (mostly) women are being sexually harassed and exploited
>>> and their own human needs and sexual desires negated - has once again
>>> been dropped in favour of erroneously accusing _anti-prostitution
>>> activists_ of being anti-_prostituted-women_ theorists.....the
>> argument
>>> below seems to hinge on the idea that because human beings are
>> rapacious
>>> it is necessary for some women men and LGBTI adults and children to be
>>> set aside as an underclass (voluntarily if possible, or paid or bribed
>>> if not) to be used as sexual receptacles so that others can be saved
>>> from rape.
>> Why are you calling human beings (prostitutes and other sex workers)
>> 'sexual
>> receptacles'? I think that fits even your definition of sexual
>> harassment.
>
>> - Volodya
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LAF mailing list
> LAF at lists.aktivix.org
> <http://us.mc246.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=LAF@lists.aktivix.org>
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/laf
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
LAF mailing list
LAF at lists.aktivix.org
https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/laf
- --
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal
http://www.freedomporn.org/ Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkpooVMACgkQuWy2EFICg+0u4QCgwL9XgKnbw1sB9+8O3tEvGKZW
hnsAoN1urZEhwkUQzx0kJsCZ7fBlTP+f
=z2g6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the LAF
mailing list