<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Sorry, meant to send this to the whole list, rather than to you individually Volodya (I'm used to Yahoo groups where it replies automatically to the list). Please don't take this as an attempt at a personal attack.<br><br>Sarah<br><br><hr>From: sarah.c.l@hotmail.co.uk<br>To: volodya@whengendarmesleeps.org<br>Subject: RE: [LAF] {Disarmed} FW: [londonfeministnetwork] asexuality<br>Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:17:46 +0100<br><br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft SafeHTML">
<style>
.ExternalClass .EC_hmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.EC_hmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}
</style>
(Some) men call themselves pro-feminist in recognition that the feminist movement is, and in order to work has to be, led by women themselves; they avoid calling themselves feminists to show that they are not trying to come into the movement and take over.<br><br>There is a rather funny Onion article on the subject:<br><br>http://www.theonion.com/content/news/man_finally_put_in_charge_of<br><br>Personally, I find the use of pro-feminist vs male feminist works as a handy litmus test.<br><br>Sarah<br><br>> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:56:39 +0100<br>> From: Volodya@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org<br>> To: laf@lists.aktivix.org<br>> Subject: Re: [LAF] {Disarmed} FW: [londonfeministnetwork] asexuality<br>> <br>> > http://www.asexuality.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45&Itemid=38 <br>> <br>> A really great article/essay. I love how the person uses 'male feminist' rather <br>> than the idiotic label i keep hearing today 'pro-feminist' (wtf does it actually <br>> mean nobody knows yet).<br>> <br>> And i have laughed reading about the response from a friend of his "it would be <br>> so much easier if i'd be asexual" fuck yes, it would be great... q;-)<br>> <br>> And there was an interesting point raised yesterday how an almost asexual person <br>> and a very pansexual one would both be classed as 'bisexual' because they are <br>> 'equally' attracted to both (or more) genders.<br>> <br>> - Volodya<br>> <br>> -- <br>> http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast<br>> http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal<br>> http://www.freedomporn.org/ Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut<br>> <br>> "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> LAF mailing list<br>> LAF@lists.aktivix.org<br>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/laf<br><br><hr>Win £3000 to spend on whatever you want at Uni! <a href="http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354032/direct/01/" target="_blank">Click here to WIN!</a>
<br /><hr />Try Facebook in Windows Live Messenger! <a href='http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354030/direct/01/' target='_new'>Try it Now!</a></body>
</html>