Mailtda's non-commercial use clause, was: Re: [matilda] crisisof consensus

[Joe Morris]

What's the point you're trying to make Chris?

Any exchange that creates profit is unacceptable
in a space like Matilda, regardless of who they are.

Steve wanted to sell his paintings in a shop set up
in Matilda so that he could a) recoop his money for supplies
and b) have spending money which would suppliment
what ever money he gets from the State.

The figure he gave was 30% to Matilda and 70% to
himself. Now if he needs to sell paintings to recoop
money for supplies, then fine, but there are other
ways to do that, than creating a shop.

Any instance where people wanted, whoever they
may be, represented with or to whomever, for the purpose
of creating "spending money" is not on..

Joe

=====================

"Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination"
- Oscar Wilde




----Original Message Follows----
From: Chris <chris at aktivix.org>
To: Joe Morris <malatesta_uk at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mailtda's non-commercial use clause,was: Re: [matilda] crisisof 
consensus
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:18:12 +0000

Hi

On Tue 08-Nov-2005 at 02:11:56PM +0000, Joe Morris wrote:
 >
 > I'm confused by your email...

Hmm, well a band that doesn't have a company does not get
covered by this, since they are collectively neither a
indvidual or company:

 > > I'm opposed to commercial exchange that is soley for
 > > an indvidual or company.

But a solo artist with no company does... since they are
an indvidual...

Chris

--
Aktivix -- Free Software for a Free World

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger 7.5 is now out. Download it for FREE here. 
http://messenger.msn.co.uk