[matilda] another fucking attack upon me this time from joe

[Chris Malins]

Maybe if, once again, all parties concerned could moderate their 
language while still expressing themselves freely, we could have a 
little more harmony. My feeling is that each of the communications 
concerned was liable to cause some annoyance to people, and that the 
first one in particular took an unnecessarily accusatory tone. It seems 
unfortunate that while defending freedom of speech we should be 
condemning people for expressing their own feelings, maybe you could 
mull on that. The tone of the first email prompted the second, which was 
in context not an unreasonable statement of position. Lets try not to 
start these arguments off if we can avoid it, it will save everyone some 
time.

Chris

worldwarfree at riseup.net wrote:
> 
> much as to what i was saying and YES i do feel there are some people
> useing this mess to ensure that c90 will not happen this is how shit
> happens i have not named any one person but gav for his lack of
> communacation that has resulted in this mess and your reply here
> 
> As far as I can see it there has been a break down in communication and some
> genuine worry about the nature of Matilda parties. That does not constitute
> some premeditated desire to stop c90 from playing or contempt for diversity.
> 
> agrees with me on this. are you honastly saying as your message gives the
> implacation my democratic right to free speach and reply should be stoped
> because you feel a little ill at ease with my comments?
> 
> much the same as dan was trying to do last week with his violance towords
> me because i did not so happen to agree with the outcome of the meeting.
> 
> just to add i do see that there are people at matilda with good honest
> intentions and joe you are one of these people i love what the cafe
> collective are doing and about.
> 
> as said in my last e mail we have to accept that people are diffront and
> acomadate them because my views do not meet those of others should not
> mean i do not have a active part in matilda i would say it means i should
> have a part and there is no doubt in my mind there are people aiming to
> provoke me to give them reson to ensure i do not have a part in matilda
> because as said my politics may not be liked by some dose not mean i
> should find myself excluded from matilda
> 
> 0742
> 
> _______________________________________________
> matilda mailing list
> matilda at lists.aktivix.org
> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/matilda
>