[matilda] Amendment to ground rules is required perhaps?

[atw]

Amparo> Now to those who don't understand what this is all about:

Amparo> There is no rule such as "No damage (vandalism, defacement, sabotage) to
Amparo> persons or to the building and its contents".
Amparo> Er... couldn't this rule be considered, and the corresponding penalties
Amparo> if the rule is breached be established.

Amparo> The incident took place without such a rule being there for
Amparo> 0742 to turn to. The situation was badly managed, 'coz
Amparo> everyone was happy with having the incident covered up asap.



Sorry but this is very misleading. In fact it has nothing to do with
rules. It was 0742's gracious decision not to have anything done about
the vandalism of his artwork.

It has also been suggested that the email list is not the best forum
for resolving this particular issue.

There appears to be a conflict between those who want to create a
society without rules and those who seemingly want to create as many
rules in Matilda as they possibly can.

steve



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/233 - Release Date: 18/01/2006