[pagan-magik] subscription

Fri Jan 14 21:06:15 GMT 2005

I agree with Nina and Sean. Shall we wait over the
weekend for any objections and if none emerge validate
the subscription on Monday? There is also a second
person awaiting subscription who I suggest this would
apply to also. 

Also do we want our archives to be open to all non
members, because if we do this process of subscription
seems a waste of effort? :)

Steve

 --- pagan-magik-request at lists.aktivix.org wrote: 
> Send pagan-magik mailing list submissions to
> 	pagan-magik at lists.aktivix.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/pagan-magik
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	pagan-magik-request at lists.aktivix.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	pagan-magik-owner at lists.aktivix.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of pagan-magik digest..."
> 
> 
> a kollektion of postings from the pagan-magik list
> ...
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. open list (steve ash)
>    2. reply to "accusations" (evol at c6.org)
>    3. evol's comment (nina)
>    4. Re: evol's comment (Sean)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:22:14 +0000 (GMT)
> From: steve ash <steveash_2001 at yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: [pagan-magik] open list
> To: pagan-magik at lists.aktivix.org
> Message-ID:
>
<20050113182214.28042.qmail at web25706.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> It seems our list security debate is somewhat
> redundant at the moment as Asim informs me he can
> read
> the archives quite readily :) So no need to CC
> him...
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 		
>
___________________________________________________________
> 
> ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even
> more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:53:17 -0000 (GMT)
> From: evol at c6.org
> Subject: [pagan-magik] reply to "accusations"
> To: pagan-magik at lists.aktivix.org
> Message-ID:
>
<10546.81.76.31.254.1105653197.squirrel at 81.76.31.254>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> hi PMA, this is asim,
> 
> i started off my answers to your questions with the
> LARC ejaculation
> because i want to get this out of the way first off.
> 
> i have already stated that the LARC leadership has
> ejaculated me and
> fabian in a "witch trial" held at their AGM.
> 
> The accusations are ridiculous , false and no
> "serious" allegations have
> been made to our faces, only rumours and slurs : and
> i willnot bother to
> go into them fully, as they are of the standard of
> the salem witch trials
> where fantastic and paranoid claims were made, all
> of which were refuted
> and yet we were expelled anyway: my majority vote,
> (in a place that claims
> to operate by consensus)
> 
> but i will outline a few things i feel are relevant
> to this list.
> 
> One of the problems LARC had with us was when we
> invoked the Yuruban God
> OSHUN at the PGA Belgrade conference. see
>
http://lists.movingpages.org/marchives/breakingthesilence/2004-October/thread.html
> 
> The PGA banned our invocation from a joint document
> without explanation.
> (this is wot made an enemy of qweeruption and
> rhythms of resistence as
> well as pga)  Fabian has stated on record that this
> was a rascist decision
> by the PGA. I will add here that this decision was
> also due to the PGA and
> LARC's fundamental cliquey Christian politics (
> exemplified in such LARC
> usergroups CAAT and ARROW ) Not that i have any
> great problem or
> opposition to these groups, but i would expect any
> pagan/majikal outlook
> or position to be at least critical of any kind of
> organised christianity
> or monotheistix.
> 
> As for my contributions to the OurMayday site, i
> will very readily declare
> that i wrote an openly challenging text
> contradicting the Womble's
> ourmayday.org.uk site when the Wombles and London
> Mayday collective had
> the nerve to cancel the Mayday/ Beltane festival in
> London last year. see
> http://ourmayday.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Mayday
> and compare it to http://ourmayday.org.uk
> 
> and if the wombles want to side with Red Ken's
> cronies and the trade
> unions against me when i assisted in casting a
> banishing spell that in
> fact helped the wombles anti-esf action then that
> just goes to show their
> true colours.
> 
> they certainly had no problems using my maps for
> their mayday promotions
> back in 2003:
>
http://chinabone.lth.bclub.org.uk/gallery/hall_of_maps/DSCN3074
> and if i'm a parasite, then this lot are vampires!
> 
> anyway, I do not believe PMA would take side of
> Christians against
> pantheists on such trumped up charges.
> 
> Space Bunny persuaded me that we should make sure
> the whole LARC episode
> does not derail us from preparing our response to
> the G8, and to network
> with you was a very constructive thing to do. Please
> do not let what
> LARC did to me, derail co-operating in our practice.
> I hope you can put
> yourself in my position of being removed from LARC
> in such a way, and
> why I brought it up, in response to your initiation
> questionaire. I
> thought it was best to bring it up first and *get
> out of way* so I did
> not get any similar related shocks here.
> 
> yours in struggle,
> xasim
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:58:29 +0000
> From: nina <nina at aktivix.org>
> Subject: [pagan-magik] evol's comment
> To: pagan-magik at lists.aktivix.org
> Message-ID: <41E70B25.1030504 at aktivix.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> hey all,
> 
> asim is not subscribed yet but i have approved the
> previous posting of 
> his, coz it's obviously relevant!
> 
> can we come to a decision on his subscription
> request? i'm all for it, 
> now that the various points of view have been raised
> - and anyway, 
> anyone can be unsubscribed and banned from the list
> should such drastic 
> a measure be ever called for..
> 
> cheers
> nina
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:58:06 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Sean <sean at hairyjedi.net>
> Subject: Re: [pagan-magik] evol's comment
> To: nina <nina at aktivix.org>
> Cc: pagan-magik at lists.aktivix.org
> Message-ID:
> 
>
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0501140945250.13111-100000 at choonz.dsvr.co.uk>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> 
> 
> Can we all please assume that silence implies
> consent on list-management 
> issues... If folk don't speak up to block someone's
> admission, we will 
> assume they feel the new member is to be welcomed
> in... it will be so much 
> easier this way than to wait for dozens of folk to
> say "i agree" or 
> similar...
> 
> love and chaos
> 
> sean
> 
> 
> 
> > asim is not subscribed yet but i have approved the
> previous posting of 
> > his, coz it's obviously relevant!
> > 
> > can we come to a decision on his subscription
> request? i'm all for it, 
> > now that the various points of view have been
> raised - and anyway, 
> > anyone can be unsubscribed and banned from the
> list should such drastic 
> > a measure be ever called for..
> > 
> > cheers
> > nina
> > _______________________________________________
> > pagan-magik mailing list
> > pagan-magik at lists.aktivix.org
> >
>
http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/pagan-magik
> > 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pagan-magik mailing list
> pagan-magik at lists.aktivix.org
>
http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/pagan-magik
> 
> 
> End of pagan-magik Digest, Vol 3, Issue 20
> ******************************************
>  

=====
Opposing Utopia for the sake of its Realisation

___________________________________________________________ 
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com