[ssf] Rage against Hallam

Chris Malins chrismalins at gmail.com
Mon Feb 7 14:17:09 GMT 2005


Absolutely agree with Dan, the social forum doesn't run on collective 
responsibility nor should it, and is supposed to be an open discussion 
space encouraging different views. Anything I have written is not 
intended to represent a definitive interpretation of what the SSF 
believes, or anyone other than myself in it believes.

Chris

Dan wrote:
> It's also worth noting a little distinction here: pedantic, but worth 
> doing.
> 
> People get together in Social Forum space and discuss an action or an 
> issue - that's what the space is provided for.  The social forum itself 
> doesn't necessarily 'endorse' it.
> 
> (This is my point of view - one or two people think that the social 
> forum /should/ endorse certain campaigns and actions.  Thoughts?)
> 
> Dan
> ----
> 
> Chris Malins wrote:
> 
>> Thought it might be worth reminding everyone that this is not an 
>> appropriate space to discuss any details of activities relating to the 
>> Rage Against Hallam project.
>>
>> Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> ssf mailing list
>> ssf at lists.aktivix.org
>> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssf
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ssf mailing list
> ssf at lists.aktivix.org
> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssf
> 



More information about the ssf mailing list