[ssf] Rage against Hallam
Chris Malins
chrismalins at gmail.com
Mon Feb 7 14:17:09 GMT 2005
Absolutely agree with Dan, the social forum doesn't run on collective
responsibility nor should it, and is supposed to be an open discussion
space encouraging different views. Anything I have written is not
intended to represent a definitive interpretation of what the SSF
believes, or anyone other than myself in it believes.
Chris
Dan wrote:
> It's also worth noting a little distinction here: pedantic, but worth
> doing.
>
> People get together in Social Forum space and discuss an action or an
> issue - that's what the space is provided for. The social forum itself
> doesn't necessarily 'endorse' it.
>
> (This is my point of view - one or two people think that the social
> forum /should/ endorse certain campaigns and actions. Thoughts?)
>
> Dan
> ----
>
> Chris Malins wrote:
>
>> Thought it might be worth reminding everyone that this is not an
>> appropriate space to discuss any details of activities relating to the
>> Rage Against Hallam project.
>>
>> Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> ssf mailing list
>> ssf at lists.aktivix.org
>> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ssf mailing list
> ssf at lists.aktivix.org
> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssf
>
More information about the ssf
mailing list