[AktiviX-discuss] proposals

[Harry Halpin]

More simply,
 	We could just make the list non-public and not keep archives. I 
mean, that's pretty simple and probably good practice for most activists.

 					-harry

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, mp wrote:

> hi,
>
> due to the evolution of the web, the increased sophistication of
> google's search algorithms and so on it is herewith proposed to
> radically reconfigure the procedures of requests and processes of
> dealing with requests for aktivix services.
>
> The proposal has three points:
>
> 1# archive entries concerning email or list requests to be removed for
> their obvious contribution to anyone who may wish to map out activist
> network (including this mail!)
>
> 2# a simple HTML form, to be placed on main page or prominently linked
> to from here, in which to make a request be substituted for current
> procedures.
>
> 3# the list-owner group should receive the requests (the form) and make
> the decision according to their knowledge of those who request, and of
> course ask for seconding etc. as necessary. there may be issues about
> accountability etc. in this context, but they are, imho, secondary and
> can easily be dealt with. if list owner group is as a minimum 5 (as
> currently) it should possible to have this level of responsibility
> delegated - taken into consideration that gains in privacy.
>
> What do people think?
>
> mp
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AktiviX-discuss mailing list
> AktiviX-discuss at lists.aktivix.org
> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/aktivix-discuss
>

-- 
 				--harry

 	Harry Halpin
 	Informatics, University of Edinburgh
         http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin