[alt-media-res] more paranioa that needs answering !!

devlishmay at aktivix.org devlishmay at aktivix.org
Wed Jan 3 00:48:58 GMT 2007


 Wondered how people wanted to respond to this 
Penniex

Hi,

We've just been discussing a funded research project on irc that includes some
imcistas as well as academics. The project focuses on the history of global
imc, it's micro-organisational workings and other things. As far as i know this
hasn't been discussed openly on any of our lists.

I've included a log of some of the irc conversation we've had, in the hope that
some of the people involved in the project, which i understand is coming to an
end could possibly respond to some of the issues and concerns expressed.

phunkee

<phunkee>        Hey can anyone shed any light on an ESRC funded project that
aims to
research amongst other things the micro-organisation and working practices of
indymedia?
        <phunkee>        just came across this link on the esrc site
        <phunkee>       
http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/ViewAwardPage.aspx?data=%2fFrXHTl993r%2b%2batuUxVraBgZvVQg%2bjzpmGAca8L%2beRV6Y2ge9fW3BYQR4n6H8P5YifkfSS9YiXdBofmc%2bw7hLtlOP1ygkTN9tLE5w%2bMyYhFYPif97r0POPKgZZD%2fxC8kpVJ7JALGN1oo%2bA7308A4FjoCKN7Hmp70XoyWjWMShj83fLKNx5gUf4MMdcBh3Dql2oS85LeLMqRccDAqIzSWZstjZCu%2boBXocGLmVDdeFTAW%2fjQHNw0LKajzK2D3rHacXzWTG%2feWl7sgTFNQrBlbbuH4GLaDHQB93%2bXcELRPywMLydWUUBz6mEJJSDYxjpWtiMNWVDF1sLC4iclwstYGZOOWNt9oojre9Drytquqwse8qBYVGmo95Q%3d%3d&xu=&isAwardHolder=&isProfiled=&AwardHolderID=&Sector=
        <alandawson>        ....it overflowed
        <phunkee>        oops
        <alandawson>        not surprised really!
        <shiar>        yes, that's the 'secret' research project some people
invlolved with
london imc and working on
        <shiar>        you can ask zoeyou
        <phunkee>        http://www.tiny.cc/alGaS
        <alandawson>        ....well it would be good to read it when its
finished :-)
        <phunkee>        is there anything about it on any imc lists?
        <shiar>        i doubt that ;)
        <shiar>        not really
        <shiar>        they haven't been very open about it
        <shiar>        but they do have a list that you can have a look at
        <shiar>        wait a sec
        <alandawson>        freedom of information request then? :-)
        <shiar>        https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/alt-media-res/
        <phunkee>        ah cheers
        <shiar>        np
        <alandawson>        is this the action research they were talking about
:-)
        <shiar>        supposedly
        <phunkee>        i don't know about anyone else but this sounds
problematic,
particularly if they haven't been 'open' about it
        * shiar        nods
        <phunkee>        was it mentioned at the network meet
        <shiar>        dunno, i wasn't there
        <phunkee>        there are some big ethical issues here for us if we're
being
'researched' by academics
        <shiar>        apart from the political questions (why would the gov
fund such a
research etc.), i have concerns about what kind of info they'll use (lists, irc
logs etc.) without telling us
        <shiar>        yeah, you feel like being spied on :P
        <phunkee>        who are these academics? i'm assuming they're not
imcistas
        <alandawson>        it looks like its come up before :
https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/alt-media-res/2006-October/000078.html
        <shiar>        some are, funnily enough
        <shiar>        in an imc london meeting yes
        <shiar>        but noting more afaik
        <alandawson>        sorry, not trying to spam
        * shiar        notes that not many attend london meetings anymore ;)
        <shiar>        phunkee: if you look at the email addresses on that list
you'll know
who
        <phunkee>       
http://alt-media-res.clearerchannel.org/public/index.php?title=FAQ
        <phunkee>        nods
        <scott>        some discussion in a london meeting. not much further.
there is some
internal dispute in the project at times as well
        <scott>        it is generally going ahead tho
        <scott>        bit like most things: forwards a little, backwards a
little, generally
making some progress
        <scott>        imc is only a little part of it, not all of it by any
means
        <scott>        different individuals within the group have different
aims, too
        * shiar        nods. but still...
        <phunkee>        hmmmm, why hasn't this been publicised if it involves
us?
        <shiar>        they didn't want that afaik
        <shiar>        and like scott said, there has been some conflict re
this
        <phunkee>        any particular reason?
        <shiar>        it's archived on their list
        <phunkee>        can anyone summarise it, i ain't got time to go through
a whole list
        <shiar>        i heard a funny explanation once, "we are indymedia, we
don't need to
tell anyone"
        <scott>        hehe. that is about true, tho
        <phunkee>        woah
        <scott>        just because we communicate, doesn't mean we are good at
communication
;-)
        <shiar>        see this email by ionnek for example
        <shiar>       
https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/alt-media-res/2006-October/000078.html
        <phunkee>        that's very provocative
        <shiar>        the research is party about our communication mechanisms
;)
        <phunkee>        it's very contradictory
        <shiar>        would be nice if people involved could explain a bit (so
we don't make
any false accusations)
        <shiar>        but then they don't seem to be willing to do that
        <shiar>        zoeyou?
        <phunkee>        well their apparent lack of communication on this issue
will fuel
this
        <shiar>        sadly true
        <scott>        well, i think part of it is the project is now actually
wrapping up
soon
        |<--        alandawson has left irc.indymedia.org:994 (Quit: Chatzilla
0.9.77 [Firefox
2.0.0.1/2006120814])
        <scott>        and also, the discussions were linked in a large way with
finance, too,
i think
        <phunkee>        scott: when were you aware of this 'poject'
        <phunkee>        project
        <scott>        also, london imc is quite informal at times (often)
        <scott>        i was aware in december 2005, i think
        <scott>        thru aktivix
        <scott>        rather than thru imc, that is
        <phunkee>        cos their list is hosted by aktivix?
        <shiar>        that's not very healthy is it?
        <scott>        what isn't very healthy?
        <scott>       
https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/aktivix-discuss/2005-December/000878.html
        <shiar>        to hear about it thru other channels
        <shiar>        mostly by accident it seems
        <scott>        well, i didn't really hear about it as just an imc thing
        <shiar>        true
        <scott>        it was about media research and they had i think 5
different projects
they wanted to work on
        <scott>        and imc was only one of them
        * chrisc        there were discussions about hosting it on aktivix also,
some people
pointed out that uk acadamic projects can get free lists on acadamic
servers...
        <scott>        yeah, there was a lot of discussion ;-)
        <shiar>        wonder if this's true tho: "who want to use their work to
funnel
        <shiar>        resources into projects like aktivix."
        * chrisc        perhaps we should ask how much money they have managed
to fullel into
which groups...
        <scott>        that bit was true
        <scott>        they tried to funnel a thousand quid (i think it was)
into aktivix....
not sure if things got completed on the aktivix end, tho
        <shiar>        they got some 44 grand i thinnk
        <shiar>        wow, that's noce
        <shiar>        nice
        <shiar>        i remeber someone saying they should have helped out indy
at the g8
        <shiar>        as a criticism, that is
        <phunkee>        i'm not comfortable with all this
        * chrisc        bbl
        <phunkee>        i don't even think it fits the criteria of ethical
social research if
we're not even aware of it
        * scott        has to go as well
        <phunkee>        they must have known people would raise these issues
        <phunkee>        so why didn't they engage with all this straight away,
when they put
the proposal together?!
        <scott>        phunkee: yes, some of them did, as i said i think that
there were
differing opinions within the group
        <scott>        i don't know anything about the original proposal, tho.
        <scott>        see you all later
        <phunkee>        nods, i see marion was open about it
        <phunkee>        :)
        <phunkee>        bye
__
Imc-uk-network mailing list
Imc-uk-network at lists.indymedia.org
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-network
Also other list of similar interest Indymedia United Kollektives process:
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-proces



More information about the alt-media-res mailing list