[Campaignforrealdemocracy] PS Fwd: [project2012] Re: 'campaign for real democracy'

james holland james at dogmanet.org
Thu May 14 09:08:06 BST 2009


i would prefer an autonomous social centre as venue, LARC?




James Holland

http://risingclevel.blogspot.com/

Mark Barrett wrote:
> PS on further thought not sure if charge thing is part of the deal or 
> just a suggestion. will check if we'd be free to use the space anyway. i 
> guess there would be some expectation that we pay something tho, and 2 
> seems really reasonable for food and meeting space. in a way this could 
> work  - those with money can share food with those without which could 
> be perfect . :-)
> 
> will check and get back.. m
> 
> 
> 
>     Agreed, it's not about endorsing any campaigns. I think we should be
>     talking about our sense that a campaign for real democracy is what's
>     needed in this time of economic and other crises, and now public
>     atmosphere of anti-politics  (or, desire for a new politics). And
>     our belief that what is needed is for local groups and individuals
>     concerned to make democracy a reality to link up across cities,
>     towns, villages and country. And to encourage people based in London
>     interested to do that to get in contact. And for people based on
>     other places to do the same and contact us to so we can build a
>     movement capable of both local and joined up regional/national
>     activity.
> 
>     Regarding Monday venue. just got this
> 
> 
>     "Fine to use the room - one holds about 20 and the other is a little
>     larger.  Jesse can sort this out.  I don't know how you feel about
>     him also providing vegan food - it's mainly the burger/chix
>     nuggets/falafel type stuff but he is expanding and will be doing
>     salads.  He also does a range of vegan pasta dishes.  What do you
>     think would be the success of charging people, say, £2 a head to
>     cover the room and a drink/food?  There is a tv in there and the
>     room has also been soundproofed.
> 
>     Actually, whilst I was in there and talking to Jesse there was a guy
>     who said that he would be interested in coming to the meetings.  I
>     got his email address so it may be worth sending him some background
>     info. [will send you this separately James]
> 
> 
>     Let me know what you think"
> 
>     Obviously though the venue sounds lovely this isn't ideal although
>     maybe we could use it once or twice for a central London meeting
>     over the course of next two weeks, before we find a central free
>     space that's suitable. I'd be ok to cover the cost for people who
>     come and can't afford 2 pounds. Shall we go for it this coming
>     Monday? Also, I will ask around as the 21st C Network meeting on
>     Transition Towns this eve as Francis now has some good venue
>     contacts. Alt is there anyway of using yr SOAS/CC connections James
>     to get a regular space there? Brit Museum courtyard cafe  is also a
>     stop gap possibility..
> 
>     Mark
> 
>     2009/5/13 james holland <james at dogmanet.org <mailto:james at dogmanet.org>>
> 
> 
>         i'm happy to print something to let people know about it to start
>         building up our human resources (i'm already working on some
>         text), but
>         less happy to start endorsing campaigns. this is a strictly
>         consensus
>         process that hasn't met yet so this is the kind of thing it
>         can't do yet.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         James Holland
> 
>         http://risingclevel.blogspot.com/
> 
>         Mark Barrett wrote:
>          > Hi James & Everyone
>          >
>          > Maybe we should draft a small flier for the big 23rd May
>         United Campaign
>          > Aagainst Police Violence demo, to introduce the campaign.
>         Hopefully we
>          > should have a venue for (bi-weekly?) meetings by then, but
>         even if not
>          > we can surely drum up some interest. As most of you will
>         know, the UCAPV
>          > initiative came straight out of the G20 debacle, although it
>         has roots
>          > going a long way back with police abuses of power.
>          >
>          > Could we make a strong, short statement making clear our
>         position on the
>          > police's role in a democratic society and calling on
>         campaigners and
>          > police alike to join us in our struggle for a very different
>         society
>          > where power is dispersed so people can act honourably and
>         responsibly -
>          > and powerfully together?
>          >
>          > Unrest is linked to injustices, perceived and real and the
>         police are
>          > being forced to defend a clapped out system - not an easy
>         position to be
>          > in. People and polcie should be able to steward their own
>         neighbourhoods
>          > together so that truth, justice and a keeping of peace are
>         served and
>          > preserved. Likewise - by extension  - the whole of our
>          > society. Apparently the mood out there anti-politics, and/or for
>          > a different kind of politics. Surely we can make  some
>         democratic hay
>          > with that on 23rd May?
>          >
>          > Mark
>          >
>          > PS Dawn and Panda, any news on the venue? I'll be in central
>         London this
>          > afternoon if you need to direct me to the place you suggested
>         on Friday,
>          > please do! PPS looking forward to Rachel's this Friday! All
>         welcome.. xx
>          >
>          >
>          > 2009/5/11 A World to Win <info at aworldtowin.net
>         <mailto:info at aworldtowin.net>
>          > <mailto:info at aworldtowin.net <mailto:info at aworldtowin.net>>>
>          >
>          >     Hi Mark - thought the 2012 listers might want to read
>         today's blog
>          >     from A World to Win.
>          >     Cheers, Corinna
>          >    
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>          >     *Parliament versus the people*
>          >
>          >     The shoddy and demeaning spectacle of MPs milking their
>         expenses’
>          >     system at the taxpayers' expense for all it is worth knows no
>          >     bounds. They have been claiming for just about
>         everything: £60,000
>          >     (Employment minister Tony McNulty) for second home
>         allowances, and
>          >     £25,000 for security patrols (Barbara Follett) down to
>         69p for a
>          >     packet of biscuits, £2.50 for eyeliner and even for Kit
>         Kats and an
>          >     Ikea carrier bag.
>          >
>          >     MPs have blatantly engaged in property speculation, using
>         allowances
>          >     to do up homes before selling them on. “Never in my 20
>         years in
>          >     politics have I seen the public as angry as they are
>         today and,
>          >     frankly, who can blame them? It doesn't help that the
>         revelations
>          >     have come at a time of recession.” Thus the Liberal
>         Democrat Norman
>          >     Baker, MP for Lewes, East Sussex, once home of revolutionary
>          >     democrat Tom Paine. Baker’s remarks are part of a growing
>         chorus
>          >     warning about the yawning credibility gap between the
>         electorate and
>          >     those who purport to represent them in parliament.
>          >
>          >     And are the Honourable Members, who include 13 members of
>         Gordon
>          >     Brown’s Cabinet, expressing any shame or remorse for
>         their venal
>          >     attitude to office? No, sublimely oblivious to criticism,
>         they are
>          >     complaining that their abuses were exposed to public
>         scrutiny. The
>          >     House of Commons authorities are even asking the police
>         to track
>          >     down the source of the leak that showed how deeply MPs’
>         snouts are
>          >     in the trough.
>          >
>          >     As the /Observer/ commented yesterday, the distance
>         between MPs and
>          >     ordinary people is now so big that they consider a
>         £24,000 second
>          >     home allowance as an “incidental” perk. For most, that is
>         a lump sum
>          >     they would never dream of seeing in their bank account.
>         And so,
>          >     warnings of the breakdown of trust upon which bourgeois
>          >     parliamentary democracy relies are flying thick and fast:
>          >
>          >         * Baker concludes that auditing, transparency and
>         limits on
>          >           expenses must be imposed – warning that “If we do
>         not, then
>          >           the trust between the people and Parliament will
>         have been
>          >           irrevocably damaged, with all the dangers that holds.”
>          >         * The /Daily Telegraph/, which first blew the whistle
>         on MPs
>          >           expenses, concludes that: "There is no doubt that
>         the current
>          >           system is rotten and cannot survive.”
>          >         * The /Daily Mail/ says it means a “terminal
>         wipe-out” for New
>          >           Labour and that Blairism’s claim to moral virtue
>         has been
>          >           “blown to shreds”. The question now, it asks, is
>         what will be
>          >           the consequences of all this. “For with such an
>         unprecedented
>          >           breakdown of Parliamentary integrity and loss of
>         public trust,
>          >           we are surely in uncharted territory.”
>          >         * And last, but not least, a /Guardian/ blogger
>         points out that
>          >           the corruption shows “how alienated the political
>         classes are
>          >           from those they serve”, demanding that Oliver
>         Cromwell come
>          >           back with a peoples’ army to shut the whole thing down.
>          >
>          >     The haughty obliviousness of New Labour after 12 years in
>         power is
>          >     indeed mind-boggling. Of course the Conservatives, and
>         indeed Sinn
>          >     Fein, have also been playing the system for all that it’s
>         worth, but
>          >     New Labour’s arrogance is far greater than that of the rest
>          >     combined. It comes at a time when income inequality in
>         Britain is at
>          >     its widest point in 40 years after 12 years of Labour
>         government, a
>          >     result of low wages and benefits held below inflation.
>          >
>          >     MPs have justified their greed by pointing to the
>         difference between
>          >     their pay and the vast salaries paid to executives in the
>         private
>          >     sector. In doing so they show that they have nothing in
>         common with
>          >     the people that they are supposed to represent. Instead
>         they draw
>          >     their “morality” from the capitalist economic system which
>          >     parliamentary democracy oversees and keeps in place.
>          >
>          >     The populist right like the /Daily Mail/ is aware that
>         the limits of
>          >     parliamentary democracy have been reached and that they
>         will be
>          >     breached. By its actions, New Labour is opening the doors to
>          >     dictatorial rule. It’s time to sound the alarm bells loud
>         and clear.
>          >
>          >     The current scandal shows the urgent need to campaign for
>         a People’s
>          >     Charter for Democracy
>          >     <http://www.aworldtowin.net/about/Rights21C.html>. The
>         aim is not to
>          >     “re-build trust” in a corrupt and undemocratic parliament
>         but to end
>          >     the rule of political elites, and create new forms of
>         direct local
>          >     and national democracy through peoples’ assemblies.
>          >
>          >     Corinna Lotz
>          >     A World to Win secretary, 11 May 2009
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          > >
> 
>         --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>         Google Groups "Project2012" group.
>          To post to this group, send email to
>         project2012 at googlegroups.com <mailto:project2012 at googlegroups.com>
>          To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>         project2012+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
>         <mailto:project2012%2Bunsubscribe at googlegroups.com>
>          For more options, visit this group at
>         http://groups.google.com/group/project2012?hl=en-GB
>         -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Petition to Abolish Tax Havens
>     http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/tobintaxnow/
> 
>     In all fighting, the direct method may be used  for joining battle,
>     but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory.
>     Indirect tactics, efficiently applied, are inexhaustible as Heaven
>     and Earth, unending as the flow of rivers and streams; like the sun
>     and moon, they end but to begin anew; like the four seasons, they
>     pass away to return once more. Sun Tzu
>     https://lists.riseup.net/www/subscribe/peopleincommon
> 
>     'A people's art is the genesis of their freedom'.
>     Claudia Jones
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Petition to Abolish Tax Havens
>     http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/tobintaxnow/
> 
>     In all fighting, the direct method may be used  for joining battle,
>     but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory.
>     Indirect tactics, efficiently applied, are inexhaustible as Heaven
>     and Earth, unending as the flow of rivers and streams; like the sun
>     and moon, they end but to begin anew; like the four seasons, they
>     pass away to return once more. Sun Tzu
>     https://lists.riseup.net/www/subscribe/peopleincommon
> 
>     'A people's art is the genesis of their freedom'.
>     Claudia Jones
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Petition to Abolish Tax Havens
> http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/tobintaxnow/
> 
> In all fighting, the direct method may be used  for joining battle, but 
> indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. Indirect 
> tactics, efficiently applied, are inexhaustible as Heaven and Earth, 
> unending as the flow of rivers and streams; like the sun and moon, they 
> end but to begin anew; like the four seasons, they pass away to return 
> once more. Sun Tzu
> https://lists.riseup.net/www/subscribe/peopleincommon
> 
> 'A people's art is the genesis of their freedom'.
> Claudia Jones
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Petition to Abolish Tax Havens
> http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/tobintaxnow/
> 
> In all fighting, the direct method may be used  for joining battle, but 
> indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. Indirect 
> tactics, efficiently applied, are inexhaustible as Heaven and Earth, 
> unending as the flow of rivers and streams; like the sun and moon, they 
> end but to begin anew; like the four seasons, they pass away to return 
> once more. Sun Tzu
> https://lists.riseup.net/www/subscribe/peopleincommon
> 
> 'A people's art is the genesis of their freedom'.
> Claudia Jones
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Campaignforrealdemocracy mailing list
> Campaignforrealdemocracy at lists.aktivix.org
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/campaignforrealdemocracy



More information about the Campaignforrealdemocracy mailing list