[Cc-webedit] [cc-socialmedia] tumbleweed

[jono]

When did outreach express that this would be better?  Not on the email
lists as far as I know.  And what exactly did the site meeting express?
 They were concerned at the national gathering that we be clear to
advertise set-up and tat-down dates to our internal networking, but
that's the latest I've heard, and this was taken on board.
jx

Richard Braude wrote:
> I think 19th-26th. If both Outreach and Site have expressed that this
> would be better, then we should have faith in our working groups and
> follow their lead.
>  
> my tuppence.
> r.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Amelia Gregory
> <info at ameliasmagazine.com <mailto:info at ameliasmagazine.com>> wrote:
> 
>     AAAAAAAAAAARGGGGGHHH the sound of tumbleweed
> 
>     I am sending the stickers to print.
> 
>     which dates??????
> 
> 
>     Amelia x
> 
>     Amelia Gregory
>     www.ameliasmagazine.com
>     twitter.com/ameliasmagazine
>     twitter.com/ameliagregory <http://twitter.com/AmeliaGregory>
>     Pick up a copy of my Anthology of Illustration now! 
>     http://tinyurl.com/anthologyofillustration
> 
> 
>     On 17 Jun 2010, at 02:28, jono wrote:
> 
>>
>>>     *8) Dates of Camp*
>>>     - Communication re: tat up and down has been confusing. Decision at
>>>     Manchester to publicise 21-24 August. Negative response on Outreach
>>>     list. Site meeting have subsequently given the steer that the Swoop
>>>     should be publicised: dates on the flyer have been changed to be
>>>     19-25
>>>     August
>>>     * BRAD to put the updated dates from the printed materials on the
>>>     Facebook and the website
>>
>>     Heya, great work.  One thing though, is that I'm not sure it's so cool
>>     to change the dates we publicise.  The Manchester decision went
>>     through
>>     a long discussion at a national gathering, including site issues and
>>     then got consensus.  And I haven't seen any discussion on the various
>>     outreach lists about changing the public dates.  If people at a large
>>     site meeting felt strongly it needed to be changed now, is there more
>>     information on this?
>>     jx
> 
>