[matilda] Use of Identifiable names in archives

[R&A]

Perhaps we are heading towards a situation where political
activity has to go underground,


Underground, where moles know how to survive, anyway


I will abide by the consensual opinion ... individual belief and 
perception sometimes suffering from anxious phobias
:-)

Thanks a lot Chris for your patience, then

She Mole

Chris wrote:

>Hi
>
>On Sun 07-Aug-2005 at 02:52:01AM +0100, R&A wrote:
>  
>
>>"means that people can follow what has been happening if
>>they want without joining a list,"
>>
>>and do we want anybody to follow what has been
>>happening, really? without us knowing at least by whom
>>we are being surveilled?
>>
>>Particularly in these times ... one may be pinpointed by
>>the Met because of something written without having
>>censorship in mind: anybody's political ideas may be
>>misunderstood and used against themselves, or don't you
>>think so and this is an ungrounded fear ?)
>>    
>>
>
>Well if you have closed archives then you have to also
>have closed membership because otherwise anyone can join
>and read the archives (of course you could have no
>archives)...
>
>I still think it is better to have the list open...
>
>Yes of course there is the danger of things being used
>against us -- for example I have heard of court cases
>where print outs from Indymedia have been used...
>
>Perhaps we are heading towards a situation where political
>activity has to go underground, but we are not yet in
>anywhere near the same situation as people are in China
>for example...
>
>Chris
>
>  
>


-- 


Please, never despise the translator. She is the mailman of human civilisation.
(Pushkin).