[matilda] monday meetings

[Helen and Nick]

I think there are problems with the Monday meeting
structure and the amount of things we have to get
through.  One solution may be for the meeting to break
up into say 3 or 4 groups and deal with certain
issues/proposals.

we could have done that last night and we could have
got through alot more things - groups of 4 or 5 people
could have had 45 mins to deal with things and then
bring them back to the main group for the remainder of
the meeting for consensus.

if we decided that there were 4 topics that needed
urgent attantion then we could have split into groups
to deal with that.
e.g.
1 group on inclusivity
1 group on who we are
1 group on new proposals
1 group on building work

I think there needs to be greater diversity of action
on a Monday night rather than everyone in a big
meeting when I think we can trust each other to be
reasonable in smaller groups.

This also comes into the inclusivity aspect which d
brought up. autonomous groups will be able to post
notices etc onto a notice board if we had one and that
would perhaps keep out the report from groups if a
note from each group was to be posted onto the
noticeboard every Monday.

just a few thoughts

NICK

--- atw <againstthewar at totalserve.co.uk> wrote:

> Another topic which was discussed briefly last night
> (briefly because
> of lack of time) was this email list.
> 
> People were concerned about acrimony etc. Also there
> was some concern
> about people who had been moderated and how that
> decision was
> reached/who was responsible etc. Significantly, to
> those on this list,
> these things have either been sorted and/or people
> don't have a
> problem with them.
> 
> One person (who's not on this list) said that this
> list was not the
> concern of the Matilda Monday meetings because it
> was something that
> existed outside of Matilda. By this I think he meant
> this list has no
> direct influence on what goes on at Matilda (apart
> from organising
> stuff that is already underway, like "who's gonna be
> around for the
> next workday?").
> 
> This wasn't agreed upon because of lack of time.
> However it seems to
> me a much better approach. I think decisions about
> how the email list
> is run are better made by people who use the list
> than those who don't
> and are just hearing about it second hand at the
> Monday meetings. In
> this the Monday meetings are acting like a
> govenment.
> 
> Many, perhaps most, people on this list don't go to
> the Monday
> meetings anyway so if final decisions regarding this
> list were made at
> Monday's meetings the people mainly affected by
> those decisions won't
> have a say in the way this list is run.
> 
> So my second proposal for the day is that this list
> should declare its
> autonomy - The Autonomous Free State of the Matilda
> Email list.
> 
> For the Monday meetings this would be one less thing
> to have on the
> agenda, which the way things are at the moment would
> be a definite
> advantage.
> 
> I think there are problems with the Monday meetings.
> There is not
> usually time to reach consensus, or even get though
> the whole agenda.
> I put this on the agenda for last night but there
> wasn't time to
> discuss it.
> 
> The way forward for me is to give more autonomy to
> collectives, and
> let more decisions be made outside of Monday
> meetings etc.. but maybe
> I'll save that for another email. First I'm gonna
> have some breakfast.
> 
> steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Independent grassroots news:
> www.sheffield.indymedia.org.uk
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/168 -
> Release Date: 14/11/2005
> _______________________________________________
> matilda mailing list
> matilda at lists.aktivix.org
> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/matilda
> 


		
___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/