poll problem, was: Re: [matilda] money stuff

[Amparo P Gutierrez]

> The way i understand this "web site" thing to work, is to be a
> relatively static
>> system, but individually editable, where collectives can place
>> their public facing documents.  The more  dynamic internal stuff
>> can be rapidly developed on the wiki.  Then when texts and contents
>> are agreed they can be placed on the website

This is very good idea. Tomorrow at the meeting we could arrange
these details.

Thanks again, cheers

Amp






Alan Dawson wrote:

> Quoting Amparo P Gutierrez <amparo2yo at telefonica.net>:
> 
> 
>> Dear Chris and Alan,
>> 
>> Thanks for answering on a Sunday: won't be able to attend hack-lab
>> on Thursday since i'm leaving on Nov 30th for a couple of weeks. I
>> was wondering if it would be possible to add a wiki component (same
>> as working now for the social forum)
> 
> 
> No.. I don't believe mkdoc supports a wiki element ( ie anonymously
> editable sections )
> 
> The other members of the art collective could register, be assigned
> editor rights overs the art collective pages and then alter and
> change those areas.
> 
> Or you could use the existing wiki. 
> https://wiki.sheffieldsocialforum.org.uk/MATILDA
> 
> The way i understand this "web site" thing to work, is to be a
> relatively static system, but individually editable, where
> collectives can place their public facing documents.  The more
> dynamic internal stuff can be rapidly developed on the wiki.  Then
> when texts and contents are agreed they can be placed on the website.
> 
> 
> So the Art Collective manifesto (say) could be developed on the wiki,
> then when you have a form of words you think best you can place them
> on the web site.
> 
> 
> AED