[matilda] Monday meeting & gig policy

[Helen and Nick]

what the hell are you on about.


--- cuthbert at riseup.net wrote:

> > "When people care alot about things being rushed
> can lead to
> > frustration and misunderstandings which then can't
> be rectified. This 
> >was certainly the case at the last meeting"
> 
> 
> Talking over someone with the word "untrue" after
> every sentence and then
> not informing us of the 'truth' when they get their
> turn to speak doesnt
> help.
> 
> Putting words in someone's mouth also doesnt help.
> 
> Making personal comments doesnt help.
> 
> ---
> 
> cuthbert
> 
> P.S. i agree with becky that playing games is not
> the answer, but treating
> people with abit more respect in meetings would
> help.
> 
> 
> 
> > things are often tense cos there is not enough
> time to discuss things
> properly.  When people care alot about things being
> rushed can lead to
> frustration and misunderstandings which then can't
> be rectified. This
> was certainly the case at the last meeting
> >
> > At the next monday meeting there is a huge amount
> of really urgent stuff to
> > get through
> >
> > PLEASE can we not spend a fifth of the meeting
> time playing games
> >
> > Instead can we all be more conscious of time
> (start bang on 7.45, keep
> contributions short and necessary etc) and what we
> have to get through,
> whilst being considerate of differing, strongly held
> views and the
> necessity
> > of finding ways to move the bigger project
> forward.
> >
> > Playing 'really silly games' has never made me
> friends with anyone, working
> > together in a respectful way has.
> > However I know different things work for different
> people so my point
> here
> > is really about a shortage of time.
> >
> > Also in the spirit of trying to minimise
> misunderstandings I think the
> minutes of the gig policy need to be amended
> > Chris wrote:
> >
> > "Gig policy
> > There was a long discussion...
> > The gig collective proposed that they be given a
> two month
> > period to use the space and there was a consensus
> on this."
> >
> > this needs to be changed to make it clear that
> during this 2m period the
> gig
> > SPACE collective will not be providing financial
> info (such as amount
> expected to be taken on the door and what will be
> done with any
> (unlikely)
> > profits) in advance of gigs.  And then this
> approach will be reviewed.
> Otherwise it doesn't reflect what the discussion was
> all about.
> > maybe someone else can provide a better wording
> (maybe Rocky or someone who
> > has the wording that Rocky said was contentious
> from the form)
> > and can someone then put it on the wiki
> >
> > Becky
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <gavin at cyber-rights.net>
> > To: <matilda at lists.aktivix.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:10 AM
> > Subject: [matilda] Monday meeting
> >
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> So, seeing as things are sometimes a little tense
> in meetings and so on
> recently, I'd like to propose that from 7.45 next
> Monday, we spend 20
> minutes playing some really silly games that a clown
> >> taught me, so we can all make friends again.
> >> x
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > matilda mailing list
> > matilda at lists.aktivix.org
> > http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/matilda
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> matilda mailing list
> matilda at lists.aktivix.org
> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/matilda
> 



		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com