[matilda] Re: simon geller

[R&A]

Dear Simon,

my questions suggest a slight misunderstanding of who Simon Geller may be.
But you shield yourself behind critical mass, unorganized coincidence 
which i happen to respect.

the vote in favour... har you're right. you're not an event to consume 
and pay for, but that's also exactly my own situation.

why not come along for a ride on Friday and find out?
why don't you come to our thursday social, you handsome cyclist?



Simon Geller wrote:

> Hello Robin,
> 
> Your questions suggest a slight misunderstanding of Critical Mass. It's
> not an organization, it's an unorganized coincidence. I'm not entirely
> clear whether a vote in favour of it or not would have an effect. See
> http://www.critical-mass.org
> 
> As for who I am, why not come along for a ride on Friday and find out.
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 02:38:17 +0100
> From: R&A <robin_amparo at tiscali.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [matilda] Critical mess
> To: matilda at lists.aktivix.org
> Message-ID: <43602F89.8020501 at tiscali.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> Well was the below critical event ever been proposed or even voted in
> favour or against?
> 
>> Sheffield's version of critical mass, also known as the Urban Cycle,
>>
>>>>will
>>>>be passing the Matilda this friday, the 28th between 5 and 6, and ringing
>>>>the bell to see if anyone wants to come out for a ride - don't expect
>>>>hundreds of cyclists though 'cos Sheffield just ain't like that. Last
>>>>time
>>>>we rang the bell and no-one answered - I wonder what will happen this
>>>>time?
> 
> 
> 
> but here we are. btw, simon being the same one who was asking if matilda
> had this or that certification, and advising us to go to the workstation
> to speak out our views about the future development of the premises. Who
> will Simon be, we wander.
> 
> 
> IMHO, Chris's paragraphs are superb: what a journalist he'd make.
> 
> R&A
> 
> 
> 
> 
>