[matilda] The particulars.

[Alan Dawson]

The document is available at 
http://www.matilda.aktivix.org/collectives/matilda/squat/summons-22-june/

Point 5 

""during the course of the event several further persons attended the premises
with knives""

If this was so .. wtf did the old bill do ? 

I agree with adam completely here.  they should drop these lies immediately.


Quoting "." <adam at diamat.org.uk>:

> 
> I've quickly read the particulars. I think the 30 unknown persons would 
> have to accept Paragraph 1,2 and 4 ... but 5 obviously needs denying.
> 
> I think it would be best if Hammonds' were contacted and asked to strike 
> P.5 themselves.
> 
> Paragraph 3 : I guess that would need to be accepted, but that's not the 
> issue -- the property was only claimed as a residence, when the Claimant 
> attempted to evict the occupants. This could be pointed out to Hammonds' 
>   with a request to negotiate a deal with the Claimant to get the 
> working space back.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> matilda mailing list
> matilda at lists.aktivix.org
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/matilda
> 


-- 
"If you make decisions about software -- or anything -- based solely on
short-term cost and benefit, someone with a longer view can easily
manoeuver you into a trap from which it is hard to escape."