[pagan-magik] request for membership reply from evol

[nina]

i am pleased that ian has pointed this issue out, coz i was going to, 
too. this is not to say that i am against evol on the list at all (!), 
but i would feel very uncomfortable if the rift in the so-called 
activist movement would deepen even further by one-sided allegations 
(from either side).. it does strike me as somewhat over the top on 
evol's part to introduce himself almost only in reference to this 
incident...

i do believe we should forward these emails also to evol, so as to 
include him (or her, of course) in the talk about him/her, but i didn't 
want to make that decision on my on, so have not cc'd this to evol.

for mutual respect and cooperation
xx nina


Ian Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:20:07AM +0000, steve ash wrote:
> 
>>>What are you seeking from your membership?
>>
>>i have recently been expelled along with a fellow majiko marxist 
>>comrade from working at the Anti-Systemic Library at London
>>Action Resource Centre (which we helped set up and run for 1.5
>>years) in Whitechapel at a secretly arranged witch trial they
>>held in December (although they did stop short of directly
>>accusing us of witch-craft)
> 
> 
> There are two sides to every story. The only recent expulsion
> from LARC that I am aware of was of Fabian and Asim, and according
> to LARC it was with good reason, as documented in their "Statement
> following LARC Annual General Meeting, 2.12.04" as posted here:
> 
> http://www.ourmayday.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?London_Action_Resource_Centre
> 
> There is also a "talk" page for discussion of the statement:
> 
> http://www.ourmayday.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?London_Action_Resource_Centre/Talk
> 
> This expulsion has already caused sigificant "collateral damage"
> within the activist movement and whilst I do not want to make
> any judgements, if the individual who is requesting membership
> of pagan-magik under the name "evol" is indeed either Fabian or
> Asim then I think it is as well to at least be aware of the
> serious allegations that have been made against them by LARC.
>