[SSC] SSC Digest, Vol 22, Issue 2
sarah at socialsciencecentre.org.uk
sarah at socialsciencecentre.org.uk
Mon Oct 1 20:09:50 UTC 2012
Wow, just saw Alan's nice podcast with Michael Fielding's talk...great! Thanks Alan.
Sarah
On Mon 1/10/12 20:04, ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org wrote:
> Send SSC mailing list submissions to
> ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> s
> sc-owner at lists.aktivix.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SSC digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: SSC Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27 (Ar_Kidda)
> 2. Re: SSC Digest, Vol 22, Issue 1 (sarah at socialsciencecentre.org.uk)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:05:01 +0100
> From: Ar_Kidda <ar_kidda@
> riseup.net>
To: ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org
Subject: Re: [SSC] SSC Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
> Message-ID: <5069BF2D.7030500@
> riseup.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 30/09/2012 22:11, ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org wrote:
> Send SSC mailing list submissions to
> > ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org
>
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org
>
> > You can reach the person managing the list
> at
> s
> sc-owner at lists.aktivix.org
>
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SSC digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Meeting on Wednesday (Darryl
> Baker)
> 2. Re: A busy week ahead. (David
> McAleavey)
> 3. Re: A busy week ahead. (Alan
> Gurbutt)
>
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:57:38 +0100
> > From: Darryl Baker <baker
> 402 at btinternet.com>
> To: "SSC at lists.aktivix.org"
> <SSC at lists.aktivix.org>
> Subject: [SSC] Meeting on Wednesday
> > Message-ID:
> <EADD067C-2B56-4643-AD6A-B4A4701A1F7F at btinternet.com>
> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> > Hi all I wish to convey my apologies for the next
> meeting on Wednesday due to a long standing family commitment.
>
> > Darryl
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:38:27 +0100
> > From: David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
> To: Alan Gurbutt <agurbutt at g
> mail.com>
> Cc: ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
> Subject: Re: [SSC] A busy week ahead.
> > Message-ID:
> >
> <CADx5COqu8AcFSL9zntD53K+KCtcVe7JMbSWY8V2cH7H4GBvUTg at mail.gmail
> .com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> > Alan,
> >
> > What happened to your daughter last Thursday needs
> to addressed separately.
> At present, I am unable to express my
> feelings.
>
> > I think our communication system has failed us again
> - the meeting
> scheduled for next Wednesday was agreed on (and
> posted to the list, I
> think) at the AGM (I think). A coffee at the Angel,
> a pint in the Jolly
> Brewer, a glass of wine over dinner at my place...
> it's the opportunity for
> dialogue, not the beverage, that counts.
> >
> > Apologies about the minutes, but they will be posted
> asap.
>
> > I do not agree with selection full stop.
> >
> > If you let Steve have your details, I am confident
> that your expenses will
> be covered.
> >
> > Respectfully yours,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30 September 2012 18:46, Alan Gurbutt <agurbutt at g
> mail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> I have to say that I don't agree with you on
> several counts and I know my
>> comments are not at all relevant, if they were,
> meetings would be consulted
>> upon before being agreed. This is a rehash of
> in-between meetings from last
>> week. There are no minutes from
> Saturday.
>>
> >> I agreed to take care of the website on Thursday
> only to find out today a
>> meeting is scheduled for Wednesday to discuss
> its development. I'm not sure
>> if I can afford to attend. If I am to attend I
> would add communication to
>> the agenda i.e., learning support. Will work be
> eligible for travelling
>> expenses?
> >>
> >> Another point is - and it was raised at Michael
> Fielding's lecture - there
>> is a disparity between community focused primary
> schools and market driven
>> higher education. I noted the commentator said
> there were some exceptions
>> to his positive experience with his primary
> school, but it didn't go far
>> enough. Purposely so.
> >>
> >> Michael Fielding was unaware of the continuation
> of academic selection as
>> young as 10 years old in Lincolnshire. Ok, I
> could have spoken out, but I
>> was concerned that talk of discrimination
> wouldn't bode well with the
>> purpose of SSC. I want to raise this
> now.
>>
> >> What does one have to do in Lincolnshire to
> become involved in democratic
>> education? I won't join the Labour Party, so was
> hoping for scope within
>> SSC.
> >>
> >> To reiterate, there is no representation for
> education on the Lincolnshire
>> coast. CERD supported anti academies in Louth,
> yet appear to have no
>> appetite to discuss rejection by 11+. Why is
> this? Furthermore, do you
>> agree that children should be selected on
> faith?
>>
> >> Just to add some context. From personal
> experience, children on the
>> coastal strip have been told in Y6 that if they
> are naughty they will go to
>> our all ability schools and academies (they are
> not comprehensives),
>> whereas, children who behave will go to grammar
> school. This is
>> Lincolnshire's worst kept secret.
> >>
> >> Back to the public lecture. I had a governor's
> meeting on Thursday so had
>> to decide whether to attend the lecture or to
> honour my commitments at our
>> school. The decision was taken out of my hands.
> I had spent the morning in
>> school discussing how to improve outcomes for
> children with additional
>> needs, but later that day my 12 year old
> daughter returned home covered in
>> spit. It was in her hair and on her coat. She
> was deeply distraught and
>> looked as though she felt violated. Grace has
> also had to endure text
>> messages from troubled pupils.
> >>
> >> I hate to admit it, but I don't think this would
> have happened in a
>> grammar school or faith based school. The type
> of school my daughters
>> attend is a byproduct of Lincolnshire's
> selective system - which, appears
>> to be supported by the DfE. This is not to say
> teachers don't work bloody
>> hard, but the odds are stacked against them.
> Academic selection distorts
>> school intakes, lowers self-esteem and
> exacerbates austerity.
>>
> >> No, I don't want to think of SSC as a Greek /
> Roman Symposium. To me this
>> would further instil snobbery, Plato elitism,
> already inherent in
>> Lincolnshire education. I want to talk about
> real-life social issues with
>> people who are able to think
> dialogically.
>>
> >> Alan
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On 30 Sep 2012, at 13:57, David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for this Steve.
> >>
> >> Thanks for offering to chair on 20.10 (or 13.10,
> if we rationalise - and
>> Alan's comment is VERY relevant re: deciding
> such things), and your
>> enthusiasm for a SSC Symposium... if I remember
> correctly, wine was also
>> considered a vital ingredient!
> >>
> >> DM
> >>
> >> On 30 September 2012 10:08, STEPHEN HOPKINS
> <hop
> kins668 at btinternet.com>wrote:
>>
> >>> David and All
> >>> I will be at the Angel Coffee House on
> Tuesday but not at the business
>>> meeting on Wednesday.
> >>> Re the agenda for Wednesday - I'd be happy
> to take the chair on the 20th
>>> October - although I wonder about
> rationalising a little and holding the
>>> meeting scheduled for the 20th on the 13th
> before/after the workshop if
>>> this is going ahead. I'm just conscious of
> peoples time.
>>> The idea of a meal sound a great one.
> Originally ( Greek and Roman ) a
>>> Symposium was a meeting with intellectual
> conversation following a meal.
>>> Perhaps we need to hold our first Symposium
> !
>>> Steve
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
>>> *To:* ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, 30 September 2012,
> 7:26
>>>
> >>> *Subject:* [SSC] A busy week
> ahead.
>>>
> >>> Dear Alan and All,
> >>>
> >>> You will not be surprised to hear that I
> would welcome the opportunity to
>>> discuss the science, and creative potential,
> of our evolved capacities for
>>> social and individual learning... I'll get
> the first coffees on Tuesday
>>> Alan!
> >>>
> >>> Tuesday: Can all scholars (student and
> teacher) raise their hand if they
>>> will be joining us at the Angel Coffee House
> at 6.00pm.
>>>
> >>> Wednesday: We have an organisational meeting
> at Pathways scheduled to
>>> start at 7.00pm
> >>>
> >>> Proposed agenda
> >>>
> >>> A new model for agenda setting/minute taking
> (Zoraida and David)
>>> Feedback on Michael's lecture
> (David)
>>> Feedback on 2nd October Angel (a student
> scholar)
>>> Decision making workshop proposal 13.10.2012
> (Sara M.)
>>> Our Purpose... I propose a meal.
> (David)
>>> Website development
> >>> Sociological Imagination
> >>> Creative Projects (2013)
> >>> A chair for 20.10.12 (David and Sarah in
> Liverpool)
>>>
> >>> Please let me have any other items for the
> agenda.
>>>
> >>> Thursday
> >>> Thanks again to Sarah, Zoraida and Mike for
> facilitating this course, I
>>> think we're all excited to see where our
> individual - and collective
>>> - imagination will lead us... which (kind
> of) brings me back to my first
>>> point. What sort of society can *we*
> imagine? How can *we* contribute to
>>> creating it?
> >>>
> >>> Respectfully yours,
> >>>
> >>> David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> _______________________________________________
>>> SSC mailing list
> >>> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> >>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
>> SSC mailing list
> >> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> >> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>>
> >>
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/ssc/attachments/20120930/d4
> 2c588e/attachment-0001.html>
>>
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 22:11:34 +0100
> > From: Alan Gurbutt <agurbutt at g
> mail.com>
> To: David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
> Cc: ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
> Subject: Re: [SSC] A busy week ahead.
> > Message-ID:
> <C75337A9-571C-4A09-9DE5-BA8B3E0160DA at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I agree that individual experiences need to be
> addressed separately but wanted to explain the context behind Thursday's
> options and variation in school experiences. The ethos behind Alex Bloom's
> school, St George's in the East, could alleviate many of Mablethorpe's
> problems but it would take a strong will. Academic selection in our area
> has led to educational apartheid and community division. It's an elephant.
> Glad we're on the same page.
>
> > Not sure about communications, particularly email.
> It's obviously easier to be in Lincoln. It might help if members could
> exchange phone numbers.
>
> > Best wishes
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On 30 Sep 2012, at 20:38, David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com> wrote:
>
> >> Alan,
> >>
> >> What happened to your daughter last Thursday
> needs to addressed separately. At present, I am unable to express my
> feelings.
>>
> >> I think our communication system has failed us
> again - the meeting scheduled for next Wednesday was agreed on (and posted
> to the list, I think) at the AGM (I think). A coffee at the Angel, a pint
> in the Jolly Brewer, a glass of wine over dinner at my place... it's the
> opportunity for dialogue, not the beverage, that counts.
>>
> >> Apologies about the minutes, but they will be
> posted asap.
>>
> >> I do not agree with selection full
> stop.
>>
> >> If you let Steve have your details, I am
> confident that your expenses will be covered.
>>
> >> Respectfully yours,
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 30 September 2012 18:46, Alan Gurbutt <agurbutt at g
> mail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi David,
> >>>
> >>> I have to say that I don't agree with you on
> several counts and I know my comments are not at all relevant, if they
> were, meetings would be consulted upon before being agreed. This is a
> rehash of in-between meetings from last week. There are no minutes from
> Saturday.
>>>
> >>> I agreed to take care of the website on
> Thursday only to find out today a meeting is scheduled for Wednesday to
> discuss its development. I'm not sure if I can afford to attend. If I am to
> attend I would add communication to the agenda i.e., learning support. Will
> work be eligible for travelling expenses?
>>>
> >>> Another point is - and it was raised at
> Michael Fielding's lecture - there is a disparity between community focused
> primary schools and market driven higher education. I noted the commentator
> said there were some exceptions to his positive experience with his primary
> school, but it didn't go far enough. Purposely so.
>>>
> >>> Michael Fielding was unaware of the
> continuation of academic selection as young as 10 years old in
> Lincolnshire. Ok, I could have spoken out, but I was concerned that talk of
> discrimination wouldn't bode well with the purpose of SSC. I want to raise
> this now.
>>>
> >>> What does one have to do in Lincolnshire to
> become involved in democratic education? I won't join the Labour Party, so
> was hoping for scope within SSC.
>>>
> >>> To reiterate, there is no representation for
> education on the Lincolnshire coast. CERD supported anti academies in
> Louth, yet appear to have no appetite to discuss rejection by 11+. Why is
> this? Furthermore, do you agree that children should be selected on
> faith?
>>>
> >>> Just to add some context. From personal
> experience, children on the coastal strip have been told in Y6 that if they
> are naughty they will go to our all ability schools and academies (they are
> not comprehensives), whereas, children who behave will go to grammar
> school. This is Lincolnshire's worst kept secret.
>>>
> >>> Back to the public lecture. I had a
> governor's meeting on Thursday so had to decide whether to attend the
> lecture or to honour my commitments at our school. The decision was taken
> out of my hands. I had spent the morning in school discussing how to
> improve outcomes for children with additional needs, but later that day my
> 12 year old daughter returned home covered in spit. It was in her hair and
> on her coat. She was deeply distraught and looked as though she felt
> violated. Grace has also had to endure text messages from troubled
> pupils.
>>>
> >>> I hate to admit it, but I don't think this
> would have happened in a grammar school or faith based school. The type of
> school my daughters attend is a byproduct of Lincolnshire's selective
> system - which, appears to be supported by the DfE. This is not to say
> teachers don't work bloody hard, but the odds are stacked against them.
> Academic selection distorts school intakes, lowers self-esteem and
> exacerbates austerity.
>>>
> >>> No, I don't want to think of SSC as a Greek
> / Roman Symposium. To me this would further instil snobbery, Plato elitism,
> already inherent in Lincolnshire education. I want to talk about real-life
> social issues with people who are able to think dialogically.
>>>
> >>> Alan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>
> >>> On 30 Sep 2012, at 13:57, David McAleavey
> <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com> wrote:
>>>
> >>>> Thanks for this Steve.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for offering to chair on 20.10
> (or 13.10, if we rationalise - and Alan's comment is VERY relevant re:
> deciding such things), and your enthusiasm for a SSC Symposium... if I
> remember correctly, wine was also considered a vital
> ingredient!
>>>>
> >>>> DM
> >>>>
> >>>> On 30 September 2012 10:08, STEPHEN
> HOPKINS <hop
> kins668 at btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>> David and All
> >>>>> I will be at the Angel Coffee House
> on Tuesday but not at the business meeting on Wednesday.
>>>>> Re the agenda for Wednesday - I'd be
> happy to take the chair on the 20th October - although I wonder about
> rationalising a little and holding the meeting scheduled for the 20th on
> the 13th before/after the workshop if this is going ahead. I'm just
> conscious of peoples time.
>>>>> The idea of a meal sound a great
> one. Originally ( Greek and Roman ) a Symposium was a meeting with
> intellectual conversation following a meal. Perhaps we need to hold our
> first Symposium !
>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
>>>>> To: ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, 30 September 2012,
> 7:26
>>>>>
> >>>>> Subject: [SSC] A busy week
> ahead.
>>>>>
> >>>>> Dear Alan and All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You will not be surprised to hear
> that I would welcome the opportunity to discuss the science, and creative
> potential, of our evolved capacities for social and individual learning...
> I'll get the first coffees on Tuesday Alan!
>>>>>
> >>>>> Tuesday: Can all scholars (student
> and teacher) raise their hand if they will be joining us at the Angel
> Coffee House at 6.00pm.
>>>>>
> >>>>> Wednesday: We have an organisational
> meeting at Pathways scheduled to start at 7.00pm
>>>>>
> >>>>> Proposed agenda
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A new model for agenda
> setting/minute taking (Zoraida and David)
>>>>> Feedback on Michael's lecture
> (David)
>>>>> Feedback on 2nd October Angel (a
> student scholar)
>>>>> Decision making workshop proposal
> 13.10.2012 (Sara M.)
>>>>> Our Purpose... I propose a meal.
> (David)
>>>>> Website development
> >>>>> Sociological Imagination
> >>>>> Creative Projects (2013)
> >>>>> A chair for 20.10.12 (David and
> Sarah in Liverpool)
>>>>>
> >>>>> Please let me have any other items
> for the agenda.
>>>>>
> >>>>> Thursday
> >>>>> Thanks again to Sarah, Zoraida and
> Mike for facilitating this course, I think we're all excited to see where
> our individual - and collective - imagination will lead us... which (kind
> of) brings me back to my first point. What sort of society can we imagine?
> How can we contribute to creating it?
>>>>>
> >>>>> Respectfully yours,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> David
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SSC mailing list
> >>>>> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> >>>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>>>> SSC mailing list
> >>>> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> >>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>> -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/ssc/attachments/20120930/39
> 82d9df/attachment.html>
>>
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SSC mailing list
> > SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> > https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>
> >
> > End of SSC Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
> > ***********************************
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 22:04:22 +0200
> From: <sarah at socialsciencecentre.org.uk>
To: <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
Subject: Re: [SSC] SSC Digest, Vol 22, Issue 1
> Message-ID: <50425.1349121862 at socialsciencecentre.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello all,
>
> Many thanks for pulling all that together, David.
>
> Hi Lisa -- really sorry for any confusion. We need to update the website
> fairly immediately. The Wednesday meeting is a bi-
weekly 'organisational' meeting that we've been having regularly for ages;
> there are dates for these on the website now that we agreed at
the big AGM in the spring. The Social Science Imagination course is running
> on Thursdays from 7-9 p.m. at Pathways Centre on Beaumont Fee,
and there will be informal gatherings and workshops available on Tuesdays
> or Wednesdays (e.g. one on the 17th on 'new ways of reading
newspapers'). There are also some Saturday workshops that are planned.
> We've only just got things really going, and there haven't been any
meetings outside meetings, only a short lull in which we don't have anyone
> looking after the website as diligently as we had before. I am
trying to finish a huge amount of work this evening for tomorrow, but will
> see if I can manage to do something with the online calendar
tonight...otherwise, tomorrow, or someone can perhaps beat me to it!
>
> I agree with Alan that it would be great to get some online discussions
> going of some of the texts that people have been recommending.
Perhaps we can do that soon.
>
> I will be at Pathways for the Social Science Imagination meeting on
> Thursday. I am teaching on Tuesdays until 6:00 p.m. so will not make all
>
of the informal gatherings. I will try to make the usual Wednesday
> meeting.
> Hi Jess -- as a matter of fact, I think we do know a couple people working
> in Wales, though not sure whether North or South. Mike, do you
remember who it was that we met in Bristol? I will try to recover the
> names.
> Wanted also to give a heads up and thanks to Megan, who has had some really
> interesting suggestions and who I'd like to chat to soon.
> In haste and looking forward to seeing other people on the course on
> Thursday.
> Best,
> Sarah
>
>
>
> On Mon 1/10/12 16:05, ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org wrote:
> Send SSC mailing list submissions to
> > ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org
> You can reach the person managing the list
> at
> s
> > sc
> -owner at lists.aktivix.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SSC digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. South Wales links? (Jesse)
> > 2. {Spam?} Launch of first Issue from 'gold' open
> access
> publisher Social Sciences Directory (Dan
> Scott)
> 3. Re: SSC Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
> (Ar_Kidda)
>
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:33:28 +0100
> > From: Jesse <jess.aga
> > in at gmail.com
> >
To: ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org
> Subject: [SSC] South Wales links?
> > Message-ID:
> >
> <CANUO4HePkLCmdkP5bjMvZPRua71o9+em0i8qKC8JM7E7z_9r=A at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I joined this list a while ago because I am very
> interested in your
> project and have considered variations on the theme
> for a couple of
> years now - mainly in the privacy of my own
> head!
>
> > I am a Lit. & Cultural Theory PhD student, just
> started at Cardiff
> University, and would be interested to know if
> anyone in this group
> has contacts in S. Wales who might be interested to
> start thinking
> about a similar Cooperative Education Centre here -
> I am new to area
> so don't - although I'm working on it!
> >
> > I'd also love to hear from anyone who has some good
> tips on the kind
> of knowledge, people and skills needed to set this
> kind of project up,
> and how long it took your group to get the point of
> being able to
> launch the Centre.
> >
> > Many thanks in advance,
> >
> > Jess Farr
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:12:11 +0100
> > From: "Dan Scott" <dan.scott at socialsciencesdirectory.com>
To: <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
> Subject: [SSC] {Spam?} Launch of first Issue from 'gold' open access
> > publisher Social Sciences Directory
> > Message-ID:
> > <002601cd9fe7$22099ed0$661cdc70$@scott at socialsciencesdirectory.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Dear Sir or Madam
> >
> >
> >
> > I am writing to you with information that can help
> your faculty,
> researchers, students and librarians to increase the
> reach and speed of
> your
> university?s output. On September 24th, the first issue of Social
> > Sciences
> Directory <http://socialsciencesdirectory.com/index.php/socscidir/index>
> ;
> ;
> was published. This is a new multi-disciplinary publication, which
> aims
> to
> revolutionise scholarly publishing by providing quality, affordable
> > content
> without the barrier of subscription paywalls. Our approach is modern
> > and
> progressive, whilst adhering to recognised publishing standards.
> >
> >
> >
> > We aim to
> >
> > ? capture the best of international research
> across the
> disciplines
> of social sciences and arts & humanities
> >
> > ? conduct peer-review and publish papers in
> online formats
>
> > ? facilitate discussion and information
> sharing through
> discussion
> platforms
> >
> > ? augment research content with valuable
> additional reading
> materials such as dissertations, reviews,
> presentations and reports
>
> >
> >
> > Our first issue contains papers on
> >
> > ? Successful transition to retirement in
> Australia
> <http://socialsciencesdirectory.com/index.php/socscidir/article/
>
>> view/19>
> > ? Knowledge, attitude and belief of pregnant
> women towards
> safe
> motherhood in a rural Indian setting
> > <http://socialsciencesdirectory.com/index.php/socscidir/article/
>
>> view/23>
> > ? Gender equality in the workplace: the
> perceptive reality
> <http://socialsciencesdirectory.com/index.php/socscidir/article/
>
>> view/24>
> >
> >
> > Our philosophy is that research in one field can
> also have applications
> in
> areas of research beyond that intended and the inter-disciplinary
> nature
> of
> a large collection of work ? spanning the boundaries of subject and
> state
> -
> will help to cross-fertilise ideas. Open access publishing provides
> > significant benefits for authors and readers alike
> in speeding up the
> time
> to publication and dissemination, author copyright retention and
> > providing
> value-for-money for taxpayers. We hope to publish a regular schedule
> > of
> research going forwards, as well as launching a sister website
> > Humanities
> Directory
> > <http://humanitiesdirectory.com/index.php/humanitiesdirectory/in
>
>> dex> in the
> next few months.
> >
> >
> >
> > We recognise the difficulty in moving from
> traditional journal publishing
> to
> new forms. You want to be able to trust that the publication maintains
> > quality standards and maximises dissemination of
> your department?s work.
> We
> also firmly believe that Social Sciences Directory addresses many of
> > the
> flaws within the scholarly publishing industry and can provide better
> > levels
> of service. Submissions have been received from the UK, Australia,
> > France,
> Brazil, Ethiopia, India and Kenya, whilst editors and reviewers from
> > all
> over the world have offered their services, demonstrating an appetite
> > and
> widespread support for the initiative. We hope that you will support
> > our
> cause, will encourage your departments to consider us when choosing
> where
> to
> publish and, importantly, will include Social Sciences Directory in
> > your
> library catalogue.
> >
> >
> >
> > Yours faithfully
> >
> > Dan Scott MA, BA (Hons)
> >
> > Director
> >
> > Social Sciences Directory Limited
> >
> > T: +44 (0)1423 326 257
> >
> > M: +44 (0)770 381 2042
> >
> >
> >
> > www.social
> > sciencesdirectory.com
> > <
> > http://www.humanitiesdirectory.com>
>> www.humanities
> directory.com
> READ IT. WRITE IT. CITE IT.
> >
> >
> >
> > Social Sciences Directory is an affiliate member of
> the Open Access
> Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) <http://oaspa.org/> .
> Dan Scott will be a speaker at the Munin open access
> conference
> <http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/ocs/index.php/Munin/MC7/schedConf/pr
>
>> ogram> at
> the University of Troms?, Norway (21-23 November 2012).
> >
> > <http://socialsciencesdirectory.com/index.php/socscidir/article/
>
>> view/33>
> Call for papers.
> >
> >
> >
> > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may
> contain confidential
> or
> legally privileged information that is intended only for the
> individual
> or
> entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended
> > recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
> > reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited.
>
> > If you have received this e-mail transmission in
> error, please reply to
> the
> sender, so that we can arrange for proper delivery, and then please
> > delete
> the message from your inbox. Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/ssc/attachments/20121001/a8
>
>> d95d43/attachment-0001.html>
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:04:48 +0100
> > From: Ar_Kidda <ar_kidda@
> > riseup.net>
> To: ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org
> Subject: Re: [SSC] SSC Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
> > Message-ID: <5069BF20.7020
> > 107 at riseup.net
> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> >
> > On 30/09/2012 22:11, ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org wrote:
> Send SSC mailing list submissions to
> > > ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org
> >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
> Web,
> visit
> > https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or
> body
> 'help' to
> > ssc-request at lists.aktivix.org
>
> > > You can reach the person managing the
> list
> at
> > s
> > sc
> -owner at lists.aktivix.org
>
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so
> it
> is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of SSC digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > > 1. Meeting on Wednesday (Darryl
> > Baker)
> > 2. Re: A busy week ahead. (David
> > McAleavey)
> > 3. Re: A busy week ahead. (Alan
> > Gurbutt)
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:57:38
> +0100
> > From: Darryl Baker <baker
> > 402 at btinte
> rnet.com>
> To: "SSC at lists.aktivix.org"
> > <SSC at lists.aktivix.org>
> > Subject: [SSC] Meeting on Wednesday
> > > Message-ID:
> >
> <EADD067C-2B56-4643-AD6A-B4A4701A1F7F at btinternet.com>
> Content-Type:
> > text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > > Hi all I wish to convey my apologies for the
> next
> meeting on Wednesday due to a long standing family
> commitment.
>
> > > Darryl
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPad
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 2
> > > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:38:27
> +0100
> > From: David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
> To: Alan Gurbutt <agurbutt at g
> > mail.com>
> > Cc: ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
> > Subject: Re: [SSC] A busy week ahead.
> > > Message-ID:
> > >
> >
> <CADx5COqu8AcFSL9zntD53K+KCtcVe7JMbSWY8V2cH7H4GBvUTg at mail.gmail
>
> .com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > > Alan,
> > >
> > > What happened to your daughter last Thursday
> needs
> to addressed separately.
> > At present, I am unable to express my
> > feelings.
> >
> > > I think our communication system has failed us
> again
> - the meeting
> > scheduled for next Wednesday was agreed on
> (and
> posted to the list, I
> > think) at the AGM (I think). A coffee at the
> Angel,
> a pint in the Jolly
> > Brewer, a glass of wine over dinner at my
> place...
> it's the opportunity for
> > dialogue, not the beverage, that counts.
> > >
> > > Apologies about the minutes, but they will be
> posted
> asap.
> >
> > > I do not agree with selection full
> stop.
> >
> > > If you let Steve have your details, I am
> confident
> that your expenses will
> > be covered.
> > >
> > > Respectfully yours,
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 30 September 2012 18:46, Alan Gurbutt
> <agurbutt at g
> mail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> Hi David,
> > >>
> > >> I have to say that I don't agree with you
> on
> several counts and I know my
> >> comments are not at all relevant, if they
> were,
> meetings would be consulted
> >> upon before being agreed. This is a rehash
> of
> in-between meetings from last
> >> week. There are no minutes from
> > Saturday.
> >>
> > >> I agreed to take care of the website on
> Thursday
> only to find out today a
> >> meeting is scheduled for Wednesday to
> discuss
> its development. I'm not sure
> >> if I can afford to attend. If I am to attend
> I
> would add communication to
> >> the agenda i.e., learning support. Will work
> be
> eligible for travelling
> >> expenses?
> > >>
> > >> Another point is - and it was raised at
> Michael
> Fielding's lecture - there
> >> is a disparity between community focused
> primary
> schools and market driven
> >> higher education. I noted the commentator
> said
> there were some exceptions
> >> to his positive experience with his
> primary
> school, but it didn't go far
> >> enough. Purposely so.
> > >>
> > >> Michael Fielding was unaware of the
> continuation
> of academic selection as
> >> young as 10 years old in Lincolnshire. Ok,
> I
> could have spoken out, but I
> >> was concerned that talk of
> discrimination
> wouldn't bode well with the
> >> purpose of SSC. I want to raise this
> > now.
> >>
> > >> What does one have to do in Lincolnshire
> to
> become involved in democratic
> >> education? I won't join the Labour Party, so
> was
> hoping for scope within
> >> SSC.
> > >>
> > >> To reiterate, there is no representation
> for
> education on the Lincolnshire
> >> coast. CERD supported anti academies in
> Louth,
> yet appear to have no
> >> appetite to discuss rejection by 11+. Why
> is
> this? Furthermore, do you
> >> agree that children should be selected
> on
> faith?
> >>
> > >> Just to add some context. From
> personal
> experience, children on the
> >> coastal strip have been told in Y6 that if
> they
> are naughty they will go to
> >> our all ability schools and academies (they
> are
> not comprehensives),
> >> whereas, children who behave will go to
> grammar
> school. This is
> >> Lincolnshire's worst kept secret.
> > >>
> > >> Back to the public lecture. I had a
> governor's
> meeting on Thursday so had
> >> to decide whether to attend the lecture or
> to
> honour my commitments at our
> >> school. The decision was taken out of my
> hands.
> I had spent the morning in
> >> school discussing how to improve outcomes
> for
> children with additional
> >> needs, but later that day my 12 year
> old
> daughter returned home covered in
> >> spit. It was in her hair and on her coat.
> She
> was deeply distraught and
> >> looked as though she felt violated. Grace
> has
> also had to endure text
> >> messages from troubled pupils.
> > >>
> > >> I hate to admit it, but I don't think this
> would
> have happened in a
> >> grammar school or faith based school. The
> type
> of school my daughters
> >> attend is a byproduct of
> Lincolnshire's
> selective system - which, appears
> >> to be supported by the DfE. This is not to
> say
> teachers don't work bloody
> >> hard, but the odds are stacked against
> them.
> Academic selection distorts
> >> school intakes, lowers self-esteem
> and
> exacerbates austerity.
> >>
> > >> No, I don't want to think of SSC as a Greek
> /
> Roman Symposium. To me this
> >> would further instil snobbery, Plato
> elitism,
> already inherent in
> >> Lincolnshire education. I want to talk
> about
> real-life social issues with
> >> people who are able to think
> > dialogically.
> >>
> > >> Alan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Sent from my iPad
> > >>
> > >> On 30 Sep 2012, at 13:57, David McAleavey
> <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for this Steve.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for offering to chair on 20.10 (or
> 13.10,
> if we rationalise - and
> >> Alan's comment is VERY relevant re:
> deciding
> such things), and your
> >> enthusiasm for a SSC Symposium... if I
> remember
> correctly, wine was also
> >> considered a vital ingredient!
> > >>
> > >> DM
> > >>
> > >> On 30 September 2012 10:08, STEPHEN
> HOPKINS
> <hop
> > kins66
> 8 at btinternet.com>wrote:
>>
> > >>> David and All
> > >>> I will be at the Angel Coffee House
> on
> Tuesday but not at the business
> >>> meeting on Wednesday.
> > >>> Re the agenda for Wednesday - I'd be
> happy
> to take the chair on the 20th
> >>> October - although I wonder
> about
> rationalising a little and holding the
> >>> meeting scheduled for the 20th on the
> 13th
> before/after the workshop if
> >>> this is going ahead. I'm just conscious
> of
> peoples time.
> >>> The idea of a meal sound a great
> one.
> Originally ( Greek and Roman ) a
> >>> Symposium was a meeting with
> intellectual
> conversation following a meal.
> >>> Perhaps we need to hold our first
> Symposium
> !
> >>> Steve
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > ------------------------------
> >>> *From:* David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
>>> *To:* ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
> >>> *Sent:* Sunday, 30 September
> 2012,
> 7:26
> >>>
> > >>> *Subject:* [SSC] A busy
> week
> ahead.
> >>>
> > >>> Dear Alan and All,
> > >>>
> > >>> You will not be surprised to hear that
> I
> would welcome the opportunity to
> >>> discuss the science, and creative
> potential,
> of our evolved capacities for
> >>> social and individual learning... I'll
> get
> the first coffees on Tuesday
> >>> Alan!
> > >>>
> > >>> Tuesday: Can all scholars (student
> and
> teacher) raise their hand if they
> >>> will be joining us at the Angel Coffee
> House
> at 6.00pm.
> >>>
> > >>> Wednesday: We have an organisational
> meeting
> at Pathways scheduled to
> >>> start at 7.00pm
> > >>>
> > >>> Proposed agenda
> > >>>
> > >>> A new model for agenda setting/minute
> taking
> (Zoraida and David)
> >>> Feedback on Michael's lecture
> > (David)
> >>> Feedback on 2nd October Angel (a
> student
> scholar)
> >>> Decision making workshop proposal
> 13.10.2012
> (Sara M.)
> >>> Our Purpose... I propose a meal.
> > (David)
> >>> Website development
> > >>> Sociological Imagination
> > >>> Creative Projects (2013)
> > >>> A chair for 20.10.12 (David and Sarah
> in
> Liverpool)
> >>>
> > >>> Please let me have any other items for
> the
> agenda.
> >>>
> > >>> Thursday
> > >>> Thanks again to Sarah, Zoraida and Mike
> for
> facilitating this course, I
> >>> think we're all excited to see where
> our
> individual - and collective
> >>> - imagination will lead us... which
> (kind
> of) brings me back to my first
> >>> point. What sort of society can
> *we*
> imagine? How can *we* contribute to
> >>> creating it?
> > >>>
> > >>> Respectfully yours,
> > >>>
> > >>> David
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> _______________________________________________
>>> SSC mailing list
> > >>> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> > >>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
>> SSC mailing list
> > >> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> > >> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>>>
> > >>
> > > -------------- next part
> --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/ssc/attachments/20120930/d4
>
>> 2c588e/attachment-0001.html>
> >>
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 3
> > > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 22:11:34
> +0100
> > From: Alan Gurbutt <agurbutt at g
> > mail.com>
> > To: David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
> Cc: ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
> > Subject: Re: [SSC] A busy week ahead.
> > > Message-ID:
> >
> <C75337A9-571C-4A09-9DE5-BA8B3E0160DA at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > I agree that individual experiences need to
> be
> addressed separately but wanted to explain the
> context behind Thursday's
> options and variation in school experiences. The
> ethos behind Alex Bloom's
> school, St George's in the East, could alleviate
> many of Mablethorpe's
> problems but it would take a strong will. Academic
> selection in our area
> has led to educational apartheid and community
> division. It's an elephant.
> Glad we're on the same page.
> >
> > > Not sure about communications, particularly
> email.
> It's obviously easier to be in Lincoln. It might
> help if members could
> exchange phone numbers.
> >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPad
> > >
> > > On 30 Sep 2012, at 20:38, David McAleavey
> <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Alan,
> > >>
> > >> What happened to your daughter last
> Thursday
> needs to addressed separately. At present, I am
> unable to express my
> feelings.
> >>
> > >> I think our communication system has failed
> us
> again - the meeting scheduled for next Wednesday was
> agreed on (and posted
> to the list, I think) at the AGM (I think). A coffee
> at the Angel, a pint
> in the Jolly Brewer, a glass of wine over dinner at
> my place... it's the
> opportunity for dialogue, not the beverage, that
> counts.
>>
> > >> Apologies about the minutes, but they will
> be
> posted asap.
> >>
> > >> I do not agree with selection
> full
> stop.
> >>
> > >> If you let Steve have your details, I
> am
> confident that your expenses will be
> covered.
>>
> > >> Respectfully yours,
> > >>
> > >> David
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 30 September 2012 18:46, Alan Gurbutt
> <agurbutt at g
> mail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi David,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have to say that I don't agree with
> you on
> several counts and I know my comments are not at all
> relevant, if they
> were, meetings would be consulted upon before being
> agreed. This is a
> rehash of in-between meetings from last week. There
> are no minutes from
> Saturday.
> >>>
> > >>> I agreed to take care of the website
> on
> Thursday only to find out today a meeting is
> scheduled for Wednesday to
> discuss its development. I'm not sure if I can
> afford to attend. If I am to
> attend I would add communication to the agenda i.e.,
> learning support. Will
> work be eligible for travelling
> expenses?
>>>
> > >>> Another point is - and it was raised
> at
> Michael Fielding's lecture - there is a disparity
> between community focused
> primary schools and market driven higher education.
> I noted the commentator
> said there were some exceptions to his positive
> experience with his primary
> school, but it didn't go far enough. Purposely
> so.
>>>
> > >>> Michael Fielding was unaware of
> the
> continuation of academic selection as young as 10
> years old in
> Lincolnshire. Ok, I could have spoken out, but I was
> concerned that talk of
> discrimination wouldn't bode well with the purpose
> of SSC. I want to raise
> this now.
> >>>
> > >>> What does one have to do in
> Lincolnshire to
> become involved in democratic education? I won't
> join the Labour Party, so
> was hoping for scope within SSC.
> >>>
> > >>> To reiterate, there is no
> representation for
> education on the Lincolnshire coast. CERD supported
> anti academies in
> Louth, yet appear to have no appetite to discuss
> rejection by 11+. Why is
> this? Furthermore, do you agree that children should
> be selected on
> faith?
> >>>
> > >>> Just to add some context. From
> personal
> experience, children on the coastal strip have been
> told in Y6 that if they
> are naughty they will go to our all ability schools
> and academies (they are
> not comprehensives), whereas, children who behave
> will go to grammar
> school. This is Lincolnshire's worst kept
> secret.
>>>
> > >>> Back to the public lecture. I had
> a
> governor's meeting on Thursday so had to decide
> whether to attend the
> lecture or to honour my commitments at our school.
> The decision was taken
> out of my hands. I had spent the morning in school
> discussing how to
> improve outcomes for children with additional needs,
> but later that day my
> 12 year old daughter returned home covered in spit.
> It was in her hair and
> on her coat. She was deeply distraught and looked as
> though she felt
> violated. Grace has also had to endure text messages
> from troubled
> pupils.
> >>>
> > >>> I hate to admit it, but I don't think
> this
> would have happened in a grammar school or faith
> based school. The type of
> school my daughters attend is a byproduct of
> Lincolnshire's selective
> system - which, appears to be supported by the DfE.
> This is not to say
> teachers don't work bloody hard, but the odds are
> stacked against them.
> Academic selection distorts school intakes, lowers
> self-esteem and
> exacerbates austerity.
> >>>
> > >>> No, I don't want to think of SSC as a
> Greek
> / Roman Symposium. To me this would further instil
> snobbery, Plato elitism,
> already inherent in Lincolnshire education. I want
> to talk about real-life
> social issues with people who are able to think
> dialogically.
>>>
> > >>> Alan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Sent from my iPad
> > >>>
> > >>> On 30 Sep 2012, at 13:57, David
> McAleavey
> <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com> wrote:
>>>
> > >>>> Thanks for this Steve.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks for offering to chair on
> 20.10
> (or 13.10, if we rationalise - and Alan's comment is
> VERY relevant re:
> deciding such things), and your enthusiasm for a SSC
> Symposium... if I
> remember correctly, wine was also considered a
> vital
> ingredient!
> >>>>
> > >>>> DM
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 30 September 2012 10:08,
> STEPHEN
> HOPKINS <hop
> > kins66
> 8 at btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>> David and All
> > >>>>> I will be at the Angel Coffee
> House
> on Tuesday but not at the business meeting on
> Wednesday.
>>>>> Re the agenda for Wednesday - I'd
> be
> happy to take the chair on the 20th October -
> although I wonder about
> rationalising a little and holding the meeting
> scheduled for the 20th on
> the 13th before/after the workshop if this is going
> ahead. I'm just
> conscious of peoples time.
> >>>>> The idea of a meal sound a
> great
> one. Originally ( Greek and Roman ) a Symposium was
> a meeting with
> intellectual conversation following a meal. Perhaps
> we need to hold our
> first Symposium !
> >>>>> Steve
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> From: David McAleavey <davidmcaleavey at virginmedia.com>
>>>>> To: ssc <ssc at lis
> ts.aktivix.org>
> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, 30 September
> 2012,
> 7:26
> >>>>>
> > >>>>> Subject: [SSC] A busy
> week
> ahead.
> >>>>>
> > >>>>> Dear Alan and All,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You will not be surprised to
> hear
> that I would welcome the opportunity to discuss the
> science, and creative
> potential, of our evolved capacities for social and
> individual learning...
> I'll get the first coffees on Tuesday
> Alan!
>>>>>
> > >>>>> Tuesday: Can all scholars
> (student
> and teacher) raise their hand if they will be
> joining us at the Angel
> Coffee House at 6.00pm.
> >>>>>
> > >>>>> Wednesday: We have an
> organisational
> meeting at Pathways scheduled to start at
> 7.00pm
>>>>>
> > >>>>> Proposed agenda
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> A new model for
> agenda
> setting/minute taking (Zoraida and
> David)
>>>>> Feedback on Michael's
> lecture
> (David)
> >>>>> Feedback on 2nd October Angel
> (a
> student scholar)
> >>>>> Decision making workshop
> proposal
> 13.10.2012 (Sara M.)
> >>>>> Our Purpose... I propose a
> meal.
> (David)
> >>>>> Website development
> > >>>>> Sociological
> Imagination
> >>>>> Creative Projects
> (2013)
> >>>>> A chair for 20.10.12 (David
> and
> Sarah in Liverpool)
> >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please let me have any other
> items
> for the agenda.
> >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thursday
> > >>>>> Thanks again to Sarah, Zoraida
> and
> Mike for facilitating this course, I think we're all
> excited to see where
> our individual - and collective - imagination will
> lead us... which (kind
> of) brings me back to my first point. What sort of
> society can we imagine?
> How can we contribute to creating it?
> >>>>>
> > >>>>> Respectfully yours,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> David
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> >
> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SSC mailing list
> > >>>>>
> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> >>>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>>>>>
> >
> _______________________________________________
>>>> SSC mailing list
> > >>>> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> > >>>> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>> -------------- next part
> --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <https://lists.aktivix.org/pipermail/ssc/attachments/20120930/39
>
>> 82d9df/attachment.html>
> >>
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SSC mailing list
> > > SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> > > https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>>
> > >
> > > End of SSC Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
> > > ***********************************
> > Dear all,
> >
> > As some of you know, I've only recently joined the
> SCC and at the moment
>
> I am very confused indeed.
> >
> > According to the SSC Website, the meetings this week
> are on Wednesday
> (Pathways). However, this mailing list mentions
> meetings on Tuesdays,
> Wednesdays and Thursdays of this week. I can only
> attend one of these,
>
> so can anyone elaborate on what these meetings are for?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Lisa White
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SSC mailing list
> > SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> > https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>>
> > End of SSC Digest, Vol 22, Issue 1
> > **********************************
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SSC mailing list
> SSC at lists.aktivix.org
> https://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc
>
> End of SSC Digest, Vol 22, Issue 2
> **********************************
>
>
>
More information about the SSC
mailing list