[Ssf] Sorry...

Dan dan at aktivix.org
Fri Oct 22 12:17:15 BST 2004


Oh, one thing:

Apologies are due from me to one person in the meeting last night:  he 
was saying that SSF hadn't decided on whether it was a 'body' capable of 
representing people or taking votes, and hadn't decided that it worked 
purely on consensus - to which I replied, 'well, the vast majority of 
people think it shouldn't be a deliberating body and should work on 
consensus'.

Which must rank as one of the daftest bits of logic I've ever come up 
with: the majority agree on the need for consensus???  Sorry to the 
person in question for being tetchy and shouty about it.

Dan

-- 
07968 997861
0114 2412723

The true meaning of life is to plant trees,
under whose shade you do not expect to sit.




More information about the ssf mailing list