[Ssf] Sorry...
Dan
dan at aktivix.org
Fri Oct 22 12:17:15 BST 2004
Oh, one thing:
Apologies are due from me to one person in the meeting last night: he
was saying that SSF hadn't decided on whether it was a 'body' capable of
representing people or taking votes, and hadn't decided that it worked
purely on consensus - to which I replied, 'well, the vast majority of
people think it shouldn't be a deliberating body and should work on
consensus'.
Which must rank as one of the daftest bits of logic I've ever come up
with: the majority agree on the need for consensus??? Sorry to the
person in question for being tetchy and shouty about it.
Dan
--
07968 997861
0114 2412723
The true meaning of life is to plant trees,
under whose shade you do not expect to sit.
More information about the ssf
mailing list