[Ssf] Re: Including...

[@mparo]

> More people should learn these skills but not everyone is capable 
> sadly.  No one comes back to badly facilitated meetings.


so said about facilitator's skills,
  a way to implement a workshop to train persons to acquire these
facilitator's skills could be devised, or has already been drawn... and
perhaps we could benefit from it.

if the meeting structure is as important as the meetings' "contents",
then these details become more important


**



Dave Havard wrote:
> Amparo wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> Facilitator shows round agenda and then has a go round group with
>>>  people introducing themselves and adding any items/issues they 
>>> want to talk about to the agenda. Agenda revised, similar items 
>>> condensed etc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I particularly vote in favour of this (above)... but Shouldn't 
>> different persons be chosen as facilitators for each Meeting? This
>>  could be done by drawing lots on each meeting, so we share the 
>> efforts of drawing agenda, etc. as facilitators would do. Thus, 
>> real inclusion or inclusivity-
>> 
>> We would share also the rewards of participating, and avoid 
>> ghettoing or éliting. Does anybody agree or has this already being
>>  proposed?
>> 
>> Hi,
> 
> 
> There are a lot of points being raised on this list but for now I 
> shall just pick up this one.  Ideally it would be wonderful for 
> everyone to take turns to facilitate.  However it takes certain 
> skills to facilitate well.  This is particularly important when the 
> meeting gets contentious.  More people should learn these skills but
>  not everyone is capable sadly.  No one comes back to badly 
> facilitated meetings.
> 
> Peace, D Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________ Ssf mailing list 
> Ssf at lists.aktivix.org http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssf
>