[Ssf] Re: about inviting guests and publicising ssf meetings...

robin&amparo robin_amparo at tiscali.co.uk
Wed Jan 19 01:48:51 GMT 2005


> More importantly, we might not be able to have enough time to talk
> for 2 hours about the anti-id card campaign and it might end up being
> a waste of time for him.


But surely if everyone knows (from the introduction) that so and such a 
person is coming from London for instance specifically to meet the ssf, 
then they will agree to their talking first... just being polite.
amparo


noone noone wrote:

>> Why should any speaker find a meeting boring?
> 
> 
> 
> There are many reasons why a speaker might find a meeting boring, for
>  example if we end up talking about somthing very local then someone
> from london might not be interested in that.  More importantly, we
> might not be able to have enough time to talk for 2 hours about the
> anti-id card campaign and it might end up being a waste of time for
> him.  This is why we need agendas for meetings so people know what
> they are coming to.
> 
> err, also i can't make tuesday, but dont let that stop anyone from 
> organising a meeting.
> 
> 
> cuthbert
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Amparo <amparo.gutierrez at tiscali.co.uk> Reply-To: SSF
>> <ssf at lists.aktivix.org> To: SSF <ssf at lists.aktivix.org> Subject:
>> [Ssf] Re: about inviting guests and publicising ssf meetings... 
>> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:01:01 +0000
>> 
>> Hello dear friends, just quick replies:
>> 
>> When reading a list of ssf messages, then i understand that Phil
>> from no2id could be invited to attend any BLue moon cafe meeting,
>> which for the time being may be OK, rather than postponing meeting
>> him indefinitely, i mean in relation to supporting the no2id
>> campaigners, and thus indirectly supporting the Manchester Social
>> Forum in its civil rights and migrants campaigns  which are being
>> developed by our friends.
>> 
>> Why should any speaker find a meeting boring? They don't come to
>> enjoy themselves precisely i suppose. IMHO, questions cannot be
>> solved onlist, because many persons who don't  participate onlist
>> could react negatively about decisions made by email. Indeed they
>> have already done so before, in my brief experience with these
>> matters.
>> 
>> Then, since it is me the person who has been publicising the SSF 
>> meetings in the last two or three months, should perhaps mention
>> that how could i know it would be wrong to do such a thing when i
>> had been told otherwise, or made to think otherwise in the context?
>> 
>> 
>> Now, does the SSF want to be better known or not??
>> 
>> See you on Thursday and anyway it was good thing to publicise this
>>  meeting , i got the right date corrected in public and now the
>> place is better known as having changed from previous venue.
>> 
>> 
>> Amparo (the culprit)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ Ssf mailing list 
>> Ssf at lists.aktivix.org http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssf
>> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________ 
> Express yourself with cool new emoticons 
> http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo
> 
> _______________________________________________ Ssf mailing list 
> Ssf at lists.aktivix.org http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/ssf
> 





More information about the ssf mailing list