[ssf] dda iii) and iv)
adam
adam at diamat.org.uk
Wed Jul 8 14:41:09 BST 2009
iii) caroline 452
i have a lady friend
recently, she said to me
'you ought to tell her you know
she can't keep having you
running around after her
all day long like this
tell her
you've got your own life'
i left my friend in the kitchen
and stepped into the smallest back yard
i've ever seen, holding a once only
barbecue set, i put it
on a waist high wall
well, waist high for me
and shuck mi head at it ...
i mean, on one level of abstraction
i have *my own life* obviously
-- i type therefore i am --
but at another level
i've been given some serious thought
to wittgenstein's horse chestnut
-- language is a game --
metaphor, and sorta get it
in a 'yeah, and we are but
actors upon it', kinda way
but fig me, sometimes
*language*, seems so much more
like fucking hard work, i was little weary
at that point, du versteh ya
ich war müde, ya
und ich bin switched
to auto-pilot:
'hold on a minute ...'
-- sez i, to the lady --
'...last time a checked
i didn't'
'dint what '
-- sez she --
'dint have a life o'mi own
do ya know what, a can't remember
the last time i did, in fact
i can't remember
the last time i checked ...'
that got me off the hook
for a little bit, because
someone else's laugh distracted
and i thought, well,
i thought lots
i started
by assuming coincidence
music was playing, radio 1, westwoood
in the background, big dog stating:
'no, i shoot blanks bro
but i take your point
they're your children man
of course you wanna be there for them man
both in the park, and in your art'
and i thought 'that's nice'
and then the artist replied --
'yeah, i'd die for my children
and i'd kill for them ...'
... and it bugged me, i mean
dunt get mi wrong, no doubt
i'd enjoyed what i'd remembered of the music
that's why i'd not tuned out
but isn't it the primary role
of a parent, to live for their kids
i mean, 'to die for'
what parent has not
at one time or another
subconsciously wished
to take upon themselves
the suffering of their child
to the fullest extent of their child's pain
and in any case, what is birth
in the main, for mothers
if not more agony, than most men
have ever endured
with a risk of death thrown in
to the bargain ...
'have had a check
-- sez i finally
to the lady --
and nayow, a don't
a dunt have a life o'mi own'
'well tha wants to get one then'
-- barked mi lady friend --
... well, back in my head again
the phrase 'it could be you'
occurred to me a little later, like
having my own life, was somehow
tantamount
to winning the lottery
of camelot
i don't play though
the odds suck, and i believe
the whole thing's a cynically set up
in order to exploit the poor
for the benefit of, well whom ...
back in mi head again
i imagine a conversation:
'i say old chap
look at all the tremendous projects
that have been built
with lottery funding'
'yeah aknow
have seen a few'
'oh, well
don't be like that
there's some very good work
that has been accomplished with the lottery
of course, there's a few bad apples'
'sure,
but where's this money coming from'
'how do you mean
the money comes from
the lottery obviously'
'yeah aknow,
but where do they get it from'
'well, the people who play'
'yeah, a.k.a. the population
it's a tax really, init'
'no, no one has to play you know'
'yeah aknow ...'
i do wonder though sometimes,
if our modern day rulers
don't treat our economies
in a way that machiavelli
advised the princes to treat war
that is, always be making it
and thinking about, how you're going to be
warring next, i mean
consider again
the lottery funded schemes:
if these projects, really do need building
how was it thought *efficient*
to invent yet another corporate body
to collect by yet another different method
contributions from the general public
when at the end of the day
that body's members
get to keep loads of it
for themselves
how do you score a life like that
do tell me,
say you somehow, get to a position
where you no longer, needed to worry
about your day to day subsistence
one could easily contemplate
what makes you so different from
the vast populous, and you may pin it
on *education* or *hard work*
or what ever else, get's you *through the night*
but you just could be confused
all along, it may have been nothing more
than not only 'it could be you'
but it actually 'was you'
that was willing
to role out and maintain
an exploitative scheme
that best fitted the purpose
not of any larger economy
but of yourselves
and the diversionary politics
of the powers that be
'but, but, but, i say old chap
consider the work generated
by the lottery, surely
you can't be suggesting
in this time of economic downturn
that we should be scrapping
yet more jobs ...'
*work* and *jobs*
are held up so often
by the politicians
to be the be-all, and end-all
the holy grail, not to be messed with
no matter what that work produces
or for that matter
what these jobs entail
for instance, globally
the four biggest markets
as i recall, are weapons
drugs, sex and food
in that world order
i mean, i'm not sure
where the oil is, but
i know that some of the politicians
like to play word association football
with the weapons industry
they call it *defence*
or *security*, and tell us
all kinds of stories
about the dangerous characters
they have helped invent
some made it sound
like *stingray*:
'anything could happen
in the next half hour'
well, forty five minutes
to save the world
an old doctoral thesis
found on the interweb
plagiarised, sexed up
and served with relish
by a very small
yet very effective
group of fear mongers
bollocks,
and known to be bollocks information
do you know, there's a petition
knocking around at the mo
at number ten
to get rid of the present occupant
i don't know, maybe i'm living in the past
but i'd like to get the last one back
at least for a little while
and ask him who, other than himself
he thought he was serving, when he lied
to start a war
i don't know whether
this can be done in the house though any more
i watch some of the older folk
chairing the committees
cross examining the bankers
but the old
are very conservative
no matter what party
and they just can't do it
it's like, they stop
and shake their heads
at the suited seated opposite
but they just can't say it
it being:
'we're fucked
i mean, it's you-lot
that have fucked the economy
big time, and make no mistake about that
but i can still hear, in how you talk
that you don't really have any remorse
in how your financial experimentation
has panned out, and why the fuck should you
when all that, you've been picking up
from this house at least
for quite a while now
is how you need to act,
how you should appear,
in order to walk away
with a big stash
rather than
what you would be doing
if your job
was really to serve
not just yourselves
and your corporate mates
but your vast clientele
a.k.a. the general public'
business is business
buyer beware
take drugs for example:
have read it in books
and have heard it said
that wars are financed
in various parts
by the surpluses reapable
in the narcotics trade
now, it would be nice
to get out of that habit, wunt it
take afghanistan for example:
how do you get out of that one, ern
get out of that one, ern
without moving ...
shush eric, stop messing
we've got important guests ...
it's all wrong you know this
i think i'm talking to kids
but i'm not in the main am i
and with kids i play to loose
it's how one learns them
or at least, it's what i tend to do
but given that,
the pretend economy has collapsed
and time is clearly of the essence
even if the apparel worn
by the criss-crossing heads
of the politico-corporate-media players
is branded 'business as usual'
i wonder if, as an adult
one should not question
what really, can this land produce
for trade and commonwealth
oh ...
now i don't know if bbc3 is propagandising
but i was listening to a programme on the box
just the other night
called from *farm to pharmacy*
and the narrators
made comment, that during number 2
that whilst the germans tested food-rationing
and additives on their concentration camp captives
and the americans did the same
to the inmates of their asylums
the british scientists carried out
the experimentation upon themselves:
the telly showed an whole group of them
restricting their portions
adding their vitamins
putting chalk in the bread
and biking-it all the way from london
to the lake district
up hills, down dales
very gaunt looking though
and serious, but then
the pictures were
black and white
it was a long time ago
rationing ...
iv) we were promised jetpacks
growing up in the seventies
over here, we had *tomorrow's world*
on the tv, showing little snapits
of how, us futures might look
based on some prototype exhibited
by an often bespectacled inventor
and we had *burke special* too
and back in the seventies
i got the idea
that there are indeed some folk
who create things
for the common good
and i suspect
from the stories they told
what had really motivated them
to make their inventions
had very little to do
with being able
to go back to some palatial pad
at the end of it all
with more fucking money
than one could
shake rattle and rool
and sometimes, it was just a *part*
of tomorrow's world, that had been produced
or some *concept* of how that part
might be used, in some distant
but touching future, that was depicted
in the pictures, and the comic books
the two thousands
and the two thousand and ones
both odyssey and major tom
sailors, rhyming on the dance floor
'and therefore
by two thousand and ten
most of us should be able
to spend our days
relaxing on a beach somewhere
we can plant flags in our navels
and blow the pendants, for our amusement
whist robots do the rest'
funny ideas
in hindsight
of how the world
might some forty year hence appear
but, very few scientists
considered back then
the environment, or
the flutterby effect
for that matter
some would say
they never do, inventors
the united states was invented too
they've not always *been there*,
the *states*, some folk dreamt them up
about two hundred years ago,
made bits, and fitted it together
it's in the history books
*israel* is the same, more recent
i mean israel the state
not israel the people
for that's a different and
older story, shechina, etc
and luxemburg said
'as a women
i have no nation'
well, why would you want one
can you imagine
the responsibility, you know
i think i take these things too much to heart sometimes
for example, a lady from the antipodes
asked me recently, where i thought the world
was going next, again economically
and i started explaining
with a self-perspective
of how we'd got ourselves
in to this fine mess
in the first place
i must have been using, *the royal we*
because mi welsh mate, who's gaff we were at
at the time, interrupted me, at one point
and said --
what do you mean *we*
i certainly have not
participated in the things
that you have been describing
yeah aknow -- sez i --
neither have i
but this ladies from abroad int she
and i'm trying to paint
a general picture:
*we british*, so to speak
i'm welsh
and i resist this culture ...
and the welsh do, and to my knowledge
have done so, for many generations
but i find myself, wearing my heart
on ma manche sometimes
like with this young french chap
who asked me a similar question
my reply, again i starts
with an islands based
self-perspective
talking with the royal pronoun
i think this french lad liked it at first
especially when i took responsibility
for the war, and told him
how i'd kinda, egged
the states in to it
how france and much of europe
had, at that time, quite rightly
chosen a different path
but then i said:
yet really, as much as i could take responsibility
for the states, he, has *france*
had to take some responsibility
for them too
politically
we must consider the states to be
a hybrid of me and you
i think he was taken quite aback
but then again
he was quite a young chap ...
More information about the ssf
mailing list