[matilda] Eek

[dan at aktivix.org]

Hi again,

Sorry for the grrr-sounding e-mails: I'm emotional enough as is it just at the
minute, and then a little righteous demon got hold of my brain and wouldn't let
go - 

Didn't mean to shout at anyone. I love you all dearly!

Crikey, it's just like a real family, except without the tar and steel wool.
Er... didn't you have that in your family?

Dan

Quoting Chris <chris at aktivix.org>:

> Hi
> 
> Well, as you know by now, we were all had by Cuthbert...
> D'oh indeed!
> 
> On Thu 06-Oct-2005 at 10:53:04AM +0100, dan at aktivix.org
> wrote:
> > 
> > The PGA Hallmarks have been discussed, at great length,
> > for months, you say?  
> 
> No, I didn't say that, I said that people have *wanted* to
> discuss them for months but they haven't been formally
> discussed -- last nights meeting was the *first* time they
> were discussed -- look back at all the notes of the
> meetings, the discussion was always *postponed*...
> 
>   https://wiki.sheffieldsocialforum.org.uk/Meetings_Archive
> 
> Personally I have *never* had the oppertunity to say why I
> think it would be good to adopt the PGA hallmarks at a
> meeting (though of course I could have has I been there
> last night...)...
> 
> > Those who want the Hallmarks have been patient? They are
> > also the only group trying to impose a single set of
> > principles on the group. 
> 
> This isn't true. Nobody has suggested that they be adopted
> without consensus and nobody has suggested that they are
> the *only* thing that the group should adopt -- look at
> the text Helen wrote (and wasn't given the oppertunity to
> propose to the meeting it was written for):
> 
>   https://wiki.sheffieldsocialforum.org.uk/Matilda_vision
> 
> This text doesn't represent a "single set of principles"
> does it?
> 
> Chris
> 
> -- 
> Aktivix -- Free Software for a Free World
> _______________________________________________
> matilda mailing list
> matilda at lists.aktivix.org
> http://lists.aktivix.org/mailman/listinfo/matilda
>