[matilda] monday's meeting

[Becky]

nick> is there meant to be a big bad issue meeting next week?  CAn anyone
nick> remember what about?  anyone wanna facilitate?

checking the minutes of the meeting (23.1.06) where we decided to deal
with all big bad issues on alternate weeks it just says:

"Then followed a long rambing discussion on the new meeting structure.
Despite possible problems it was decided to try it and see. Because many
things are still left to be resolved there would be extra meetings
focusing on specific long term issues like money, decision making, security
etc."

do we need to discuss security?
do we need to discuss decision making?
these are genuine questions so I'm hoping for serious replies - has the
'decision making' discussion been overtaken by the new structure?
steve did you put this on the agenda and want to make a case for it?
can anyone think of any other big bad issues that we need to discuss
constructively?
for example at the money meeting the question of raising money was
shelved - should we deal with that now before it runs out?

if theres benefit to be gained from having a meeting I can offer to
facilitate but it'd be good to get its purpose sorted in the next day or
so.
Becky