[matilda] Blocking etc

[Helen and Nick]

What if we cannot agree?


In all but a very few cases the above model will
achieve consensus within the group providing there is
commitment to coming to a decision. However there are
times when one or more people disagree more or less
strongly with the rest of the group and no solution is
in sight. Listed below are some ways of dealing with
this. The first two, non-support and standing aside,
allow the group to proceed with the decision, whilst
allowing reservations to be expressed. See also the
section When not to use consensus



Non-support: "I don't see the need for this, but I'll
go along with it."


Standing aside: "I personally can't do this, but I
won't stop others from doing it." The person standing
aside is not responsible for the consequences. This
should be recorded in the minutes.


Veto/major objection: A single veto/major objection
blocks the proposal from passing. If you have a major
objection it means that you cannot live with the
proposal if it passes. It is so objectionable to
you/those you are representing that you will stop the
proposal. A major objection isn't an "I don't really
like it " or "I liked the other idea better." It is an
"I cannot live with this proposal if it passes, and
here is why?.!". The group can either accept the veto
or discuss the issue further and draw up new
proposals. The veto is a powerful tool and should be
used with caution.

Leaving the group: If one person continually finds
him/herself at odds with the rest of the group, it may
be time to think about the reasons for this. Is this
really the right group to be in? A group may also ask
a member to leave.


		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com