[matilda] We want in-for-mation
Dan
dan at aktivix.org
Fri Mar 24 20:59:16 GMT 2006
> At Leeds common place the landlords dont seem to have done very much it
> has been all down the common place collective.
Depends on a couple of things. First, what you agree to take on in a
lease. Longer term leases tend to mean that the tenant(s) take on
responsibility for the building fabric. I doubt Common Place have to
fix the roof or re-do their wiring.
Second, a lot of these rented derelict 'works' tend to remain a grey
area - to the benefit of both landlord and tenant. You can probably
think of a few around S1 and S7 where this happens. Only time will tell
if we can get away with that too.
> Possibly the most worrying thing about this latest visit is that after
> asking almost everyone i have seen in matilda nobody seems to know about
> it.
Ah ha! You are seeing your role all upside-down, dude: you are a
champion of knowledge, spreading information through-out the MATILDA
massif. A pioneer, no less! Forging ahead with your new-found wealth
of exclusive factoids and handing them out, willy-nilly, to everyone you
- with your on-the-ground knowledge of who's best - deem worthy to also
become meme vessels for the fact that some H&S consultants are coming round.
Serious point, though: turn that round, dude. It's not worrying: how
else are we to find out except through what's been done, which is a) we
learned at Monday's meeting b) I've e-mailed the list and c) you're
telling people? Did you expect YF to send us a fax?
Of course, YF didn't come and tell anyone in MATILDA. That's coz we
don't exist officially. They're dealing with LTT.
> from
> cuthbert
love
Dan
More information about the matilda
mailing list