[Ssf] HARSH READING BUT YOU MUST READ:

[noone noone]

>"But I'm gonna suggest we stick to a policy that's served the list since it 
>started: it's better not to pour petrol on the fire by discussing it on 
>this list."

Sorry about this dan, but i dont want 2005 to be a repetition of 2004, which 
means that i dont want the constant attention grabbing and self-centred 
self-indulgence.

  For me it goes down to the fact that if i can't be confident in inviting
other people to take part in this thing called the ssf then why the hell am
i involved?

for now
cuthbert


>From: Dan <dan at aktivix.org>
>To: noone noone <machinevman at hotmail.com>
>CC: ssf at lists.aktivix.org, worldwarfree at riseup.net
>Subject: Re: [Ssf] HARSH READING BUT YOU MUST READ:
>Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:58:12 +0000
>
>Hey up,
>
>There could, of course, be a lot to say about this, Mozaz.
>
>But I'm gonna suggest we stick to a policy that's served the list since it 
>started: it's better not to pour petrol on the fire by discussing it on 
>this list.  This ain't the place to talk about it, and the meeting later 
>today *most definitely* isn't the place to talk about it.
>
>So let's not talk about it.
>
>Mozaz - if anything like that comes through again, I'm going to ask the 
>list whether people are happy for me to moderate your posts.
>
>love
>
>Dan

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger